Teams

Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 1

2024 KS 18 & Over Mixed Indoor League · 5.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-16vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 2Split 11
L#1 DoublesKahlil Saad / Miriam Saad vs Anand Vennavelli / Nikki McCoy5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Stierwalt / Kym Ratcliffe vs ABDULLA NAIM / Amber Wilson6-3, 6-0
2023-12-12vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Ratcliffe / Kim Ritchie vs ABDULLA NAIM / Joni Duran6-3, 7-5
2023-12-09vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Ratcliffe / Kym Ratcliffe vs Anand Vennavelli / Nikki McCoy6-1, 6-1
2023-12-05vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Ratcliffe / Erica Combs vs Anand Vennavelli / Rosanne Greene3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-12-02vs Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Ratcliffe / Charissa Evans vs Anand Vennavelli / Rosanne Greene3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-11-18vs Bulnes - Genesis, SalinaWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Stierwalt / Kim Ritchie vs Cale Sharp / Kim Disberger6-4, 7-5
2023-11-18vs Bulnes - Genesis, SalinaWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Stierwalt / Kim Ritchie vs Cale Sharp / MJ Sharp7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 130451176
2Bulnes - Genesis, Salina000000
3Morris - Genesis, Wichita000000
4Genesis Rock Road - MXD FLEX 2033614103

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Kym Ratcliffe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Charissa Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Peter Ratcliffe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Erica Combs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Miriam Saad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Kahlil Saad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Kim Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.89
Theresa Devlin
published
Joseph Stierwalt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miriam Saad + Kahlil Saad1740% games−7.6% vs expected
Erica Combs + Peter Ratcliffe3349% gamesnot enough data
Kim Ritchie + Joseph Stierwalt224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kym Ratcliffe
45W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Charissa Evans
22W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Peter Ratcliffe
25W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Erica Combs
30W–65L career · 1 line in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
Miriam Saad
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.55
Kahlil Saad
6W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
95%5%<1%
2.28
Kim Ritchie
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.26
Theresa Devlin
10W–20L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Joseph Stierwalt
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.