Teams

Tokidoki

2026 Team Singles (55 and Over) · 3.0 Woman

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-02-23vs TBD CeliaWon 10
W#1 SinglesHelen Ramos vs Mary Rustia2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-12vs TBD CeliaLost 01
L#1 SinglesSharon Vidal vs Mary Rustia2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-01-30vs TBD CeliaWon 10
W#1 SinglesDebby Shin vs Celia Shen6-3, 6-3
2026-01-23vs TBD CeliaWon 10
W#1 SinglesHelen Ramos vs Sharon Stehlik6-1, 6-1
2026-01-12vs TBD CeliaWon 10
W#1 SinglesSharon Vidal vs Sharon Stehlik6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Woman
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tokidoki4343761
2TBD Celia3434961

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Sharon Vidal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.04
Helen Ramos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.99
Cheryl Hay
published 3
2.66
Debby Shin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Vidal + Debby Shin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sharon Vidal
117W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Helen Ramos
80W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.04
3
Cheryl Hay
49W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Debby Shin
74W–84L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.