Teams

Th.Roschel40A

2026 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.78 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-19vs Mo.Garrell40AWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Talbot / Thassia Roschel vs Laura Edgerton / Tina Krasner7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Nels / Stephanie Williams vs Cara Garrett / Francie LaRue7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnne Newton / Molly Chaffee vs Sheffield Kropp / Sherry Elder3-6, 6-7
2026-05-12vs Je.Komes40A3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesThassia Roschel / Megan Lynch vs Bryan Kern / Jenny Komes3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Megan Kimsey4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Lee Gillenwater / Molly Chaffee vs Kinsey Wennerstrom / Courtney Carey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-28vs Sa.Kane40ALost 13
W#1 DoublesThassia Roschel / Laura Lee Gillenwater vs Jennifer Martin / Jessica McGinnis6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesErin Maher vs Mari Stratemeier4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Talbot / Erin Reis vs Sharon Fadelici / Sabrina Kane6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Newton / Lauren Gray vs Dawn Morriston / Tamara Faulkner2-6, 1-6
2026-04-21vs Er.Hemminger40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesThassia Roschel / Kelly Talbot vs Erin Hemminger / CAROLINE FLAMANT6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Lynnsy Summitt3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMandy Steinhardt / Stephanie Ratliff vs Melissa Rini / Casey Novak1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Blevins / Erin Reis vs Tina Dahir / Kay Bonavita4-6, 4-6
2026-04-14vs Kr.Gilreath40A3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesMegan Lynch / Laura Lee Gillenwater vs Taqiyya Yasin / LaTara Lewis0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesThassia Roschel vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Williams / Anne Newton vs Kristi Gilreath / Jamie McCallum4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Peterson / Erin Maher vs Brandi Washington / Kristen Gillispie4-6, 3-6
2026-04-07vs Ke.Hurter40AWon 40
W#1 DoublesKelly Talbot / Kelly Blevins vs Julia Hughes / Janis McLaughlin7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Erin Lewis6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMandy Steinhardt / Lauren Gray vs Millie Raynor / Kelly Hurter7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMolly Chaffee / Anne Newton vs Gina Hardy / Brandy Vannoy6-0, 6-1
2026-03-24vs Ka.Landi40AWon 30
W#1 SinglesErin Maher vs Elizabeth Robinson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Lee Gillenwater / Kelly Nels vs Cate Edwards / Lexie Batchelor5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Blevins / Courtney Peterson vs Katie Landi / Mary A Vlahoplus6-1, 6-3
2026-03-17vs Br.Robinson40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Lynch / Kelly Nels vs Erika Plant / Jennifer McFarling6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErin Reis / Lauren Gray vs Crystal Beard / Brittany Robinson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Ratliff / Molly Chaffee vs Kristina Faulkner / Mary Lewis James6-3, 6-4
2026-03-10vs We.Bargoil40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesKelly Blevins / Kelly Talbot vs Wendy Bargoil / Laura Panebianco3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErin Maher vs Tracy Dickerson6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnne Newton / Molly Chaffee vs Molly Clark / Kate Rigsbee6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessica Tyndall / Stephanie Williams vs Amy DiGiuseppe / Sheri Roberson6-3, 7-6
2026-03-03vs La.McRee40AWon 40
W#1 DoublesStephanie Ratliff / Laura Lee Gillenwater vs Rossana Prevost / Kim Manning7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Stephanie Fogarty3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesThassia Roschel / Courtney Peterson vs Michelle Metelo / Erica Surgent6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErin Maher / Erin Reis vs Shannon Aumer / Lisa Hammond6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings38 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Er.Hemminger40A10035518256
2As.Walker40A9134613204
3An.Redmond40A91271329293
4Je.Komes40A3.082281228275
5Kr.Gilreath40A3.082291129286
6Hop.Pflaum40A82281231303
7Sa.Kane40A82271331272
8Zo.Whitesell40A7024412165
9Cl.Duff40A7024415203
10Ca.Grimes40A73231736282
11Th.Roschel40A64231739337
12Ch.Hochstrasser40A64182250358
13Ju.Liddle40A5220818188
14Je.Wolborsky40A3.052181025241
15Ki.Meeker40A52151327221
16Li.McDermott40A55241637314
17Sh.Clarkson40A43161229254
18Ju.Clark40A43161231270
19Ju.Shuey40A43151332275
20Je.SagalSolomon40A46182254406
21La.McRee40A46142655375
22La.Daigle40A34131533267
23Ma.Basil40A34121634244
24Li.Howard40A34121634269
25As.Grantham40A37142656383
26We.Bargoil40A37152556395
27Am.Koch40A37132759406
28Br.Robinson40A37122859401
29Ka.Southern40A25121634273
30Me.Green40A25111738281
31Ch.Mccorquodale40A2591940286
32Mo.Garrell40A28152559416
33Ke.Hurter40A28112961406
34Ki.Lamb40A19112960402
35Ka.Landi40A19112964439
36An.Pershke40A0742450310
37Ki.Roberts40A0732551321
38Am.Ray40A010103066428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Thassia Roschel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.79
Kelly Nels
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.77
Kelly Talbot
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Laura Lee Gillenwater
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Molly Chaffee
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.66
Anne Newton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Erin Reis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.62
Jessica Tyndall
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.57
Kelly Blevins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Mandy Steinhardt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.55
Erin Maher
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Chaffee + Erin Reis12754% games+0.7% vs expected
Jessica Tyndall + Kelly Nels4255% gamesnot enough data
Erin Reis + Kelly Nels5068% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Tyndall + Erin Reis134 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Steinhardt + Thassia Roschel033 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Blevins + Kelly Talbot123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Blevins + Anne Newton303 matchesnot enough data
Molly Chaffee + Kelly Nels213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Thassia Roschel
45W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
2.5
Kelly Nels
69W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
Kelly Talbot
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Carrie Martinelli
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Laura Lee Gillenwater
27W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
2.5
Molly Chaffee
67W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
3
Anne Newton
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
2.5
Erin Reis
51W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%13%87%
2.66
2.5
Jessica Tyndall
47W–70L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
Kelly Blevins
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Mandy Steinhardt
52W–90L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Erin Maher
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.