Teams

LTFC YELLOW

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-03vs RRTC YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarb Hedges / Elizabeth Bendalin vs Dusty Fitzgerald / Michelle Sachs0-6, 0-6
2024-08-27vs SS-H ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Benson / Barb Hedges vs Elaine Knox / Sarah Coghlan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatherine Hahn / Carol Jochens vs Kaitlyn Bridgers / Laura Montoya5-7, 2-6
2024-08-20vs SS-LGT YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatherine Hahn / Carol Jochens vs Jamie Steese / Mandy Paul3-6, 6-7
2024-08-13vs PCC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Gordon / Barb Hedges vs Lisa Damico Anderson / Karina Stevens6-3, 6-1
2024-08-06vs LTFC GOLDWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Hahn / Carol Jochens vs Kristi Savignano / Ki Kellen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-30vs RRTC YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatherine Hahn / Carol Jochens vs Amanda Iapalucci / Michele Cunningham2-6, 2-6
2024-07-23vs SS-H ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Benson / Barb Hedges vs Ankie Richard / Judy Flaherty6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Jochens / Cindy Gordon vs Rachel Frisz / Elaine Knox7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Barb Hedges
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Carol Jochens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Lori Benson
published
4.06
Elizabeth Bendalin
published 4.5
3.94
Urte Land
published
3.44
Melissa Griese
published
Katherine Hahn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Benson + Elizabeth Bendalin61246% games−2.4% vs expected
Barb Hedges + Elizabeth Bendalin3945% games−4.8% vs expected
Carol Jochens + Barb Hedges224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Jochens + Elizabeth Bendalin033 matchesnot enough data
Barb Hedges + Lori Benson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Barb Hedges
40W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Carol Jochens
80W–88L career · 5 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
Lori Benson
15W–27L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
4.5
Elizabeth Bendalin
41W–50L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Urte Land
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
Melissa Griese
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Katherine Hahn
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.