Teams

ACAC Olson/Curtis

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-08vs Battery Park Frenzel 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCraig Anderson / Gary Berg vs Benton Boone / Dylan Holt1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Naputi vs Nicholas Daniel4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Peskind vs Chris Gaines2-6, 0-6
2025-06-04vs Powhatan 3.0 Tennisbums - KelleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesBradford Rhodes / Thomas Tirrell vs Malcolm Bickley / Michael Martin4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlexander Smith vs John Rogers6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDavid Naputi vs Malik Mathews5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-01vs Burkwood 3.0 ButterworthWon 31
L#1 DoublesCraig Anderson / Doug Nunn vs Andrew Hylton / Benjamin Bursae2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRobert Peskind vs David Sanderson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesThomas Tirrell / Greg Jabs vs Scott Schoenwiesner / Steven Denunzio4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGary Berg / Bradford Rhodes vs Steve Read / Dan Peimer6-3, 6-1
2025-05-18vs Willow Oaks FranksLost 13
L#1 DoublesPeter Olson / Doug Nunn vs Ivan Mullinax / Travis Hamilton4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Tirrell / Gary Berg vs Colin Mott / Byron Chafin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRobert Peskind vs Patrick McDuff5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBradford Rhodes / David Naputi vs Hank Heyming / Thomas Schaaf4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-10vs Hermitage - Smith WKENDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPeter Olson / Craig Anderson vs Christopher Forstner / Turner Broughton1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGreg Jabs / Thomas Tirrell vs JR Pruden / Robert Adams3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRobert Peskind vs Blair Smith7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Naputi / Bradford Rhodes vs Rodney Williams / Ralph Whitt2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-27vs Westwood Whalers-LemcoLost 04
L#1 DoublesCraig Anderson / Peter Olson vs Christopher Carlin / Bailey White4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGary Berg / Greg Jabs vs Joel Horning / Michael Flynn0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Naputi vs Cabell Doyle2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBennett Lee / Thomas Tirrell vs Juan A Astruc Jr. / Sacha Shaygan2-6, 4-6
2025-04-13vs MAC Strings - NovakWon 32
W#1 DoublesPeter Olson / Doug Nunn vs Todd Manning / James Temple6-7, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlexander Smith vs Gary Kessler3-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Anderson / Chris Young vs Zack Griffith / Patrick Clapp6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDavid Naputi vs Joseph Gault3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBennett Lee / Bradford Rhodes vs Paul Haynes / Mark Chronis2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAlexander Smith / Craig Anderson vs Julius Anongos / Rajaram Dhananchezian5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPeter Olson / Greg Jabs vs Jared Collier / Brian Newman6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRobert Peskind vs Don Bruce2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Tirrell / Gary Berg vs Elamaran Anbalagan / Ramkumar Selvarathinam6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Alexander Smith
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Thomas Tirrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Gary Berg
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Craig Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Peter Olson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Greg Jabs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Robert Peskind
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.63
Bradford Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.60
David Naputi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.56
Bennett Lee
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Doug Nunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Olson + Craig Anderson3940% games−1.5% vs expected
David Naputi + Bradford Rhodes314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexander Smith
18W–37L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Thomas Tirrell
18W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Gary Berg
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Craig Anderson
19W–38L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Peter Olson
24W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Greg Jabs
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Robert Peskind
22W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Bradford Rhodes
10W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
David Naputi
28W–25L career · type A · 11 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Bennett Lee
13W–15L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
Doug Nunn
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.