Teams

TSanz (Russell)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-22vs RChow (PCC)Split 11
L#2 DoublesSharon Norman / Mary Wegener vs Lacey Johnson Boatman / Pam Richardson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristie Hansen / Leigh Ingram vs Elizabeth Rudder / Trina Blankenship7-5, 6-4
2024-04-15vs MEccleston/LBaddigam (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLucia Royal / Sharon Norman vs Melissa Eccleston / Jennifer McNally2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Perkins / Christie Hansen vs Lesly Carlton / Laura Difraia3-6, 3-6
2024-04-08vs KMassaro (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Perkins / Lucia Royal vs Tracey Loughlin-Young / Jessica Cook6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJanet Fiedor / Leigh Ingram vs Anna Boyd / Jacqui Gentile6-3, 6-2
2024-04-01vs EConklin (Carmel)Split 11
W#2 DoublesTerri Hood / Mary Wegener vs Melanie Carroll / Jennifer Harrison7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichele Collins / Christie Hansen vs Jen Dauska / Mary Davis1-6, 2-6
2024-03-18vs BSwann (Pine Lake)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLucia Royal / Debbie Barnes vs Lydia Schoeck / Allison Moseley3-6, 6-7
2024-03-11vs KPredmore (Springfield)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesLucia Royal vs Elizabeth Smith1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLeigh Ingram / Mary Wegener vs Traci Prieto / CHRISTI DEWAELE2-6, 4-6
2024-03-04vs DShealy/TRand (FCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Perkins / Lucia Royal vs Danielle Shealy / Julianne Gray6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTerri Hood / Leigh Ingram vs Joanne Hurley / Jennifer Voci7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Lucia Royal
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Terri Hood
published
3.20
Kate Palanica
published
3.18
Sharon Norman
published
3.12
Janet Fiedor
published
3.09
Leigh Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Teresa Brown
published
2.91
Christie Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Mary Wegener
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Wegener + Leigh Ingram3840% gamesnot enough data
Janet Fiedor + Terri Hood123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lucia Royal
31W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Terri Hood
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Kate Palanica
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Sharon Norman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Janet Fiedor
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Leigh Ingram
29W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.09
Teresa Brown
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Christie Hansen
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Mary Wegener
15W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.