Teams

WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Hubbard

2024 WI Tri-Level · WI Omega Doubles Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.08 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#2 DoublesAlexander Strunce / Andy Berens vs Arune Brekke / Joseph King6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Jing / Shu Kai Tan vs Matthew Lister / Mark Eriksson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlbert Men / Alexander Strunce vs Marques Degrandis / Erik Dustrude6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDaniel Jing / Shu Kai Tan vs Aidan Stuckert / Abtin Molavi3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Berens / Alexander Strunce vs Noah Garber / Tadeas Lunga6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHari Putti / Kyle Cunningham vs Jere Bauer III / Jose Nunes7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarlos Marquez / Derek Hubbard vs Robert Goetz / Seth Taapken6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPrathap Palaniswamy / Kevin McAllister vs Carl Sorge / Michael Becker4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlexander Strunce / Albert Men vs Robbie Spiegler / Gregory Meyer6-0, 6-1
2024-01-23vs WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT KimWon 20
W#2 DoublesDerek Hubbard / Alexander Strunce vs Seongho Choi / John Rice2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKyle Cunningham / Kevin McAllister vs Kevin Kim / Woo J Kim6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDerek Hubbard / Andy Berens vs REMESH BALAKRISHNAN / Narman Antony Peter4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Jing / Shu Kai Tan vs Dhinesh Ravi Krishna / Zachary Kornbluth6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDerek Hubbard / Carlos Marquez vs Christian Kitchen / Kyle Coplan7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPrathap Palaniswamy / Kevin McAllister vs Joe Leung / Hongbo Chen6-1, 6-1
2024-01-04vs WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT MiuraWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlbert Men / Derek Hubbard vs Kai Bachmann / Asa Miura6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKyle Cunningham / Daniel Jing vs Angelo Lenarduzzi / Osagyefo Kouta-Lopatey6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WI Omega Doubles Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Hubbard9026111180
2WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Whiteis72161124221
3WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Kim72171025222
4WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Boregowda54121531227
5WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Antony Peter54141332262
6WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Dundas45131433241
7WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Isensee36131433242
8WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Knutson36111637270
9WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Miura1891837256
10WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Mavlyutov1842349311

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Justin Yee
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
4.32
Tony Mirasola
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
4.26
Carlos Marquez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.00
Alexander Strunce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Derek Hubbard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Prathap Palaniswamy
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Albert Men
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Andy Berens
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.56
Kyle Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kevin McAllister
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Hari Putti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Daniel Jing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jed von Heimburg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shu Kai Tan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thorben Waldburger
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tony Mirasola + Thorben Waldburger5159% games+6.2% vs expected
Hari Putti + Prathap Palaniswamy30761% games+6.0% vs expected
Jed von Heimburg + Thorben Waldburger404 matchesnot enough data
Jed von Heimburg + Carlos Marquez404 matchesnot enough data
Alexander Strunce + Carlos Marquez314 matchesnot enough data
Tony Mirasola + Carlos Marquez213 matchesnot enough data
Justin Yee + Jed von Heimburg123 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Cunningham + Kevin McAllister303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Yee
100W–50L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
4.47
Tony Mirasola
31W–23L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Carlos Marquez
89W–37L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4
Alexander Strunce
50W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
4.5
Derek Hubbard
64W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.90
Prathap Palaniswamy
120W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Albert Men
53W–7L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Andy Berens
50W–25L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kyle Cunningham
37W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kevin McAllister
71W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Hari Putti
95W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Daniel Jing
26W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jed von Heimburg
64W–24L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shu Kai Tan
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thorben Waldburger
25W–14L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.