Teams

Imran, Moin

2026 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Men 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Kimble, PaulLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Holston / Austin O'Brien vs Paul Kimble / Michael Collins7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhillip Pace / Dario Rosa vs David Adams / Mitch Evans3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGraham Bucciantini / Randy Harris vs Jay Irving / Nico Jimeno2-6, 5-7
2026-08-12vs Walker, NivenLost 03
L#1 DoublesAustin O'Brien / Scott Holston vs Lane Clower / Kenneth Miller6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGraham Bucciantini / Randy Harris vs Paige Purvis / Randy Tuggle3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMoin Imran / Foster Jordan vs Jeffrey Carmody / Stan Fisher1-6, 4-6
2026-08-05vs Kimble, PaulLost 03
L#1 DoublesAkhilesh Ganti / Greg Williamson vs Paul Kimble / Kevin McKay3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Martin / Jeremy Self vs David Adams / Mitch Evans1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFoster Jordan / Moin Imran vs Michael Collins / Nico Jimeno2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Walker, Niven1030019
2Kimble, Paul1030015
3Imran, Moin02061274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Austin O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Randy Harris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Jeremy Self
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Dario Rosa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.10
Greg Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Hiren Arora
published
3.10
Scott Holston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Foster Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Phillip Pace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Akhilesh Ganti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Graham Bucciantini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Moin Imran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Akhilesh Ganti + Greg Williamson1536% games+6.2% vs expected
Phillip Pace + Greg Williamson044 matchesnot enough data
Dario Rosa + Austin O'Brien033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Austin O'Brien
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Randy Harris
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jeremy Self
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
4
Dario Rosa
4W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
Greg Williamson
9W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Hiren Arora
22W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Scott Holston
22W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Foster Jordan
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Phillip Pace
40W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3.5
Akhilesh Ganti
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.91
Graham Bucciantini
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.90
Moin Imran
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.