Teams

ATA Team

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-28vs Bradshaw/LR/LRACLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeslie King-Gillispie / Alvin Rogers vs Kathryn Peacock / Bynum Matthews4-8
L#2 DoublesJay Heflin / Sara Gardner vs Kirk Bradshaw / Karen Koen4-8
L#3 DoublesDennis Gilliam / Cendey Roberts vs Wyatt Miller / Mary Rhoades6-8
2026-07-26vs Bradshaw/LR/LRACLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlvin Rogers / Leslie King-Gillispie vs Bynum Matthews / Kathryn Peacock6-8
L#2 DoublesDennis Gilliam / Cendey Roberts vs Wyatt Miller / Mary Rhoades6-8
L#3 DoublesSara Gardner / Jay Heflin vs Karen Koen / Kirk Bradshaw6-8
2026-07-20vs Bradshaw/LR/LRACLost 03
L#1 DoublesCendey Roberts / Dennis Gilliam vs Wendy Mikula / Eric Sixbey5-8
L#2 DoublesDave Bobbitt / Devona Shelton vs Gary Jones / Dottie Highfill2-8
L#3 DoublesJay Heflin / Sara Gardner vs Kirk Bradshaw / Karen Koen6-8
2026-07-19vs Bradshaw/LR/LRACLost 03
L#1 DoublesJay Heflin / Sara Gardner vs Kirk Bradshaw / Karen Koen4-8
L#2 DoublesDennis Gilliam / Cendey Roberts vs Wendy Mikula / Eric Sixbey4-8
L#3 DoublesDevona Shelton / Dave Bobbitt vs Gary Jones / Dottie Highfill1-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Jay Heflin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Leslie King-Gillispie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Cendey Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.78
Sara Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Dave Bobbitt
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.72
Dennis Gilliam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.68
Devona Shelton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Alvin Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Gilliam + Cendey Roberts1548% games+13.9% vs expected
Leslie King-Gillispie + Alvin Rogers1445% gamesnot enough data
Jay Heflin + Sara Gardner044 matchesnot enough data
Dave Bobbitt + Devona Shelton134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Heflin
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.34
Leslie King-Gillispie
31W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
4.16
4
Cendey Roberts
31W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Sara Gardner
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Dave Bobbitt
13W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Dennis Gilliam
5W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Devona Shelton
22W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Alvin Rogers
19W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.