Teams

EConigliaro

2022 Capital Summer 40 & Over Singles League · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs EMcAllisterWon 21
W#1 SinglesRamona Holdstock vs Button Hall4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesErin Conigliaro vs Heather Jayson7-5, 6-4
L#3 SinglesRochelle Grieco vs ROBIN Lamb6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-07-17vs EMcAllisterWon 10
W#2 SinglesRamona Holdstock vs Nikki DAmbrose6-0, 6-2
2022-07-14vs EMcAllisterSplit 11
L#1 SinglesErin Conigliaro vs Eva Garland6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRamona Holdstock vs Janelle Howard6-2, 6-1
2022-06-29vs EMcAllisterWon 10
W#1 SinglesErin Conigliaro vs Janelle Howard6-4, 6-1
2022-06-22vs EMcAllisterWon 10
W#2 SinglesKana Brinckerhoff vs Erin McAllister6-4, 6-3
2022-06-18vs EMcAllisterLost 12
L#1 SinglesErin Conigliaro vs Eva Garland6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKana Brinckerhoff vs Heather Jayson6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesRochelle Grieco vs ROBIN Lamb2-6, 4-6
2022-06-15vs EMcAllisterSplit 11
L#1 SinglesErin Conigliaro vs Nikki DAmbrose4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKana Brinckerhoff vs Janelle Howard7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Ramona Holdstock
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.93
Kana Brinckerhoff
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.92
Kate Cannon
published
3.71
Erin Conigliaro
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.41
Rochelle Grieco
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Carolyn Roach
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kana Brinckerhoff + Erin Conigliaro6354% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ramona Holdstock
149W–125L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
4.06
4
Kana Brinckerhoff
238W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.93
Kate Cannon
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Erin Conigliaro
175W–128L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Rochelle Grieco
226W–191L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Carolyn Roach
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.