Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

22 players · average NTRP 4.44 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesAnindya Banerjee / Spencer Hsu vs Nick Martinez / Theo Novak3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Connor Ard
published 4.5
4.41
Aaron Douville
published 4.5
4.32
Glenn Teixeira
published 4.5
4.29
Matt Lourens
published
4.28
Garrett Krueger
published 4.5
Alex Baier
published 4.5
4.20
Ralph Saviano
published
4.12
Brian R Wills
published 4.5
4.12
Ryan Lehmer
published
4.08
Keith Edwards
published
4.06
Steven Lehmer
published
4.05
Tal Yahud
published
4.01
Anindya Banerjee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Hitendra Mishra
published 4.5
3.99
Vikram Kadi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.97
Jeff Forbes
published
3.94
Thomas Lyhne
published
3.93
Tom Kincaid
published
3.92
Todd H Waibel
published
3.90
Parag Bhatt
published
3.88
Andrew Stinnett
published 4
Kimmel Sadat
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Teixeira + Ralph Saviano2345% gamesnot enough data
Aaron Douville + Keith Edwards303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor Ard
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Aaron Douville
29W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Glenn Teixeira
30W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
Matt Lourens
35W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Garrett Krueger
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Alex Baier
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ralph Saviano
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Brian R Wills
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.12
Ryan Lehmer
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.12
Keith Edwards
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
Steven Lehmer
25W–19L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
Tal Yahud
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Anindya Banerjee
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.01
4.5
Hitendra Mishra
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.99
Vikram Kadi
13W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
Jeff Forbes
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.97
Thomas Lyhne
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Tom Kincaid
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.93
Todd H Waibel
22W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Parag Bhatt
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Andrew Stinnett
23W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Kimmel Sadat
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.