Teams

Coins, Jimmie

2022 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Kay Beasley
published
2.92
Erika Andrews
published 3
2.79
Robynne Shields
published
2.78
Anita Trigg
published 3
2.76
Natalie Holmes
published
2.64
Donna Ross
published 3
Debra Black
published 2.5
Kelsey Mathews
published
Timika Franklin
published
Tonyatta Hairston
published
Yolanda Burks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Andrews + Kay Beasley5354% games+5.2% vs expected
Erika Andrews + Natalie Holmes13955% games+2.9% vs expected
Kay Beasley + Anita Trigg2354% games−6.2% vs expected
Donna Ross + Natalie Holmes3347% gamesnot enough data
Donna Ross + Erika Andrews213 matchesnot enough data
Erika Andrews + Anita Trigg303 matchesnot enough data
Kay Beasley + Natalie Holmes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kay Beasley
52W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Erika Andrews
64W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
Robynne Shields
40W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Anita Trigg
59W–58L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Natalie Holmes
52W–28L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Donna Ross
22W–24L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
2.64
2.5
Debra Black
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelsey Mathews
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Timika Franklin
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tonyatta Hairston
13W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Yolanda Burks
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.