Teams

Er.Beiter18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-06vs Ke.Abourisk18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesJaydeep Punde / Nate Wireback vs Kevin Abourisk / Brian Baron1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesNate Wireback vs Ryan Sheppard1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-15vs Ch.Mack18ALost 01
L#2 SinglesNate Wireback vs Tevin Wilson4-6, 3-6
2025-03-25vs Ma.Gregson18A4.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesNate Wireback vs Scott Scarneo1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAbhimanyu Joshi / Kiran Ramaswamy vs Stephen Holmes / Aaron Heil6-3, 6-3
2025-03-18vs Je.Monaghen18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesKiran Ramaswamy / Abhimanyu Joshi vs Jason Liner / Andy Sands7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNate Wireback vs Robert Petrakis6-0, 6-2
2025-03-11vs Ke.Abourisk18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKiran Ramaswamy / Abhimanyu Joshi vs Timothy Koves / Kyle Faltisco6-4, 6-2
2025-03-04vs Ra.Xu18ALost 01
L#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Justin Fowler0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Abhimanyu Joshi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Will Howell
published
3.71
Nate Wireback
usually #1 Singles 27%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.65
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.52
Michael Ratliff
published
3.46
Jaydeep Punde
published
3.46
Shawn Murphy
published
3.08
Bert Clancey
published 3.5
Lei Ji
published
Tony Oates
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kiran Ramaswamy + Abhimanyu Joshi6262% games+8.1% vs expected
Nate Wireback + Will Howell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abhimanyu Joshi
124W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.01
Will Howell
21W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.74
3.5
Nate Wireback
96W–45L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.71
4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–129L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Michael Ratliff
30W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jaydeep Punde
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Shawn Murphy
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Bert Clancey
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Lei Ji
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Oates
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.