Teams

CDTA S 18&O 4.0M Naperville Podwika Thurs 7 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

15 players · average NTRP 3.91 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesCraig Berry / Kevin Podwika vs Mark Abellera / John Leubner6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBryan Copre vs Jonah Karafiol6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNoah Baker / Scott Modica vs Rick Aguayo / Carlos Flores2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJay Goldner / Scott Modica vs Dwight Anderson / Krystian Drozdz6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAnthony Noti vs James Barnett6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesNate Pualengco / Kevin Podwika vs Rex J Lao / Joon Sung2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Crowe vs Tony Lyu2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Gatz / Scott Modica vs Gregg Rousseau / Paul Tiu4-6, 3-5
L#1 DoublesHoward Hoff / Kevin Podwika vs James Brown / John Leubner3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNate Pualengco vs David Burciaga2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Gatz / Scott Modica vs Rick Aguayo / Rafael Lozada6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNate Pualengco vs Dan Saviano3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Berry / John Gatz vs Jay Guthmann / Brady Stein2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBryan Copre vs Bryant Beal6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScott Modica / Noah Baker vs James Barnett / Chris O'Malley6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNate Pualengco vs Nexus Stewart6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Podwika / Scott Modica vs Andrew Jacobs / Rex J Lao4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesCraig Berry / Douglas Anderson vs Christopher Darnielle / Keith Boutell6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Crowe vs Kartheepan Sivaguru2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBryan Copre vs Julian Garcia7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesScott Modica / Anthony Noti vs Steve Franks / Bob Schnoll3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 4.0M Tam Aguayo Sat 1 $228034618259
2CDTA S 18&O 4.0M Tam Rousseau Sun 1 $2262291128277
3CDTA S 18&O 4.0M Naperville Podwika Thurs 7 $2034112449343
4CDTA S 18&O 4.0M Oak Brook TC Franzo Sun 12 $2026152559422
5(DROPPED) CDTA S 18&O 4.0M River Trails Miller Tues 7:30 $20000000
6CDTA S 18&O 4.0M Glenbrook Franks Sat 3 $250762959377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Anthony Noti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.84
John Gatz
published 4
3.78
Bruce Thornquist
published 4
3.75
Kevin Podwika
published 4
Benjamin Crowe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Bryan Copre
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Craig Berry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Don Carstens
published 4
Howard Hoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jay Goldner
published 4
2.76
Eric Esancy
published 3
Jonathan Ibarra
published
Logan Triplitt
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Nate Pualengco
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Scott Modica
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Gatz + Don Carstens41052% games+6.9% vs expected
Kevin Podwika + Don Carstens5454% games+4.7% vs expected
Howard Hoff + Bruce Thornquist5267% games+3.6% vs expected
Jay Goldner + Bruce Thornquist33565% games+2.7% vs expected
John Gatz + Scott Modica372754% games+0.9% vs expected
Kevin Podwika + Bruce Thornquist171154% games+0.4% vs expected
Kevin Podwika + John Gatz6654% games−0.3% vs expected
Scott Modica + Bruce Thornquist10258% games−4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Noti
32W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
John Gatz
163W–118L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Bruce Thornquist
238W–98L career · type A · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Kevin Podwika
361W–203L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Benjamin Crowe
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bryan Copre
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Craig Berry
26W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Don Carstens
51W–49L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Howard Hoff
36W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Jay Goldner
135W–55L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
3
Eric Esancy
154W–187L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Jonathan Ibarra
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Logan Triplitt
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nate Pualengco
37W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Modica
110W–76L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.