Teams

TeamForman (Riviera Prep)

2022 Miami-Dade Combo 18 & Over - Night · 6.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.39 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2022-08-11vs Miami-Dade/GaryLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudy Prado / Nathalia Blanco vs Zule Abad / Beth Story3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-04vs Rodriguez (Doral Park)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMellissa Cili / Randi Sandler vs Sandra Orozco / Dayana Oca7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-27vs Burke (Royal Palm)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJudy Prado / Maira Maguire vs Jeanne Spital / Lourdes Salazar6-1, 6-0
2022-07-21vs Terrazas (MLAC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesANGELA MUSSO / Patricia Carroll-Tzakis vs MONICA DONATO / Jacinta Betances2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-20vs Romeu (Tropical Park)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMaira Maguire / Judy Prado vs Ana Cerbu / Liliana Salmon6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMellissa Cili / Mira Hashe vs Yvonne Imbert / Sandra Veloz de Guillen6-1, 6-2
2022-07-14vs Rodriguez (Alper JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBertha Lowell / Mellissa Cili vs Maria Albacarys / Maria Eugenia Russe6-1, 6-3
2022-07-11vs Remigio (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaira Maguire / Mellissa Cili vs Dominique Penaloza / Natalia Guendsechadze6-4, 7-6
2022-07-07vs Miami-Dade/GarySplit 11
W#2 DoublesMellissa Cili / Paola Campanella vs Kristi Atkison / Caroline Humphrey7-5, 5-5
L#3 DoublesPatricia Carroll-Tzakis / ANGELA MUSSO vs Isabel Maestu / Yersika Fernandez Labrador6-7, 3-6
2022-06-30vs Rodriguez (Doral Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJudy Prado / Bertha Lowell vs Vilmaliz Rodriguez / Griselda Navarro Varela6-2, 6-3
2022-06-29vs deDios (Crandon Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMonica Pardo / Judy Prado vs Gema de Dios / Margarita Nunez6-2, 7-6
2022-06-20vs Rodriguez (Alper JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaritza Marchand / Mellissa Cili vs Claudia Gomes / Lorraine Perez6-0, 6-3
2022-06-16vs Terrazas (MLAC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesPatricia Carroll-Tzakis / Mellissa Cili vs Lyana Blokhina / Maria Rocca di Turi6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-06vs Romeu (Tropical Park)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMonica Pardo / Judy Prado vs Lorraine Perez / Ana Cerbu2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMellissa Cili / Mira Hashe vs Gilda Noboa / Jeannie Serrano6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Judy Prado
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.57
Mellissa Cili
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.51
Nathalia Blanco
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Leticia Diaz
published
3.38
Kelly James
published
3.34
Alejandra Taylor
published 3.5
3.33
Penelope Johnson
published
3.25
3.17
3.09
Paola Campanella
published
3.04
ANGELA MUSSO
published 3.5
2.89
2.87
Patricia Carroll-Tzakis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Dileidy Barbosa
published 3
2.66
Martha Maldonado Alkhaldi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ANGELA MUSSO + Maria Fernandez de Castro4253% games+10.7% vs expected
Penelope Johnson + Leticia Diaz10361% games+4.7% vs expected
Nathalia Blanco + Leticia Diaz16562% games+4.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco + Leticia Diaz6556% games+1.0% vs expected
Mellissa Cili + Judy Prado8258% gamesnot enough data
Judy Prado + Nathalia Blanco3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Judy Prado
208W–126L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Mellissa Cili
229W–184L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Nathalia Blanco
323W–115L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
Leticia Diaz
78W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kelly James
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Alejandra Taylor
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Penelope Johnson
28W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Maria Fernandez de Castro
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Paola Campanella
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
ANGELA MUSSO
8W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Maria Vermejo Blumen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Patricia Carroll-Tzakis
197W–132L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Dileidy Barbosa
74W–33L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Martha Maldonado Alkhaldi
42W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.