Teams

FCCC

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-04vs MLF REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTara Delaney / Angie Decklever vs Magdalena Joyce / Penny Netherby6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJana Burns / Maria Irianni Renno vs Peggy Nowak / Ewa Pawlak6-3, 6-1
2022-06-02vs MLF YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTara Delaney / Angie Decklever vs Mariana Treat / Bettina Cosima Larrarte6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Irianni Renno / Jana Burns vs Kristin Henninger / Melissa Byrne3-6, 6-7
2022-05-23vs LTWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Decklever / Tara Delaney vs Ruth Duncan / Kay Lucas6-3, 6-3
2022-05-05vs HMTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAngie Decklever / Tara Delaney vs Allison Miller / Donna Taub6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJana Burns vs Mary Hulse2-6, 4-6
2022-04-28vs MLF YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Decklever / Jana Burns vs Leslie Taylor / Kristin Henninger7-5, 6-4
2022-04-21vs MLF REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Delaney / Jana Burns vs Magdalena Joyce / Penny Netherby6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Angie Decklever
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Tara Delaney
published
2.73
Deanna Verchick
published 3
2.73
Jana Burns
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Mallory Blair
published
Maria Irianni Renno
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Delaney + Jana Burns2352% games−3.6% vs expected
Tara Delaney + Deanna Verchick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Decklever
100W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Tara Delaney
52W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Deanna Verchick
28W–31L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Jana Burns
41W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Mallory Blair
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Irianni Renno
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.