Teams

MPTC - Open

2023 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Singles Wednesday · Open HTA Ladies Singles

11 players · average NTRP 4.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-03-04Won 10
W#4 SinglesKimberly Elliott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-01vs ROCC - ROCC OnLost 01
L#3 SinglesKimberly Elliott vs Inna Sergeeva6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-02-12Won 10
W#4 SinglesKimberly Elliott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Open HTA Ladies Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
Hannah Watson
published 5
4.48
Melissa Ariza
published
4.32
Alex Kornajcik
published 4.5
4.31
Melissa Stryker
published
Anna Schraer
published 4.5
Clothilde Thirouin
published 4.5
Emma Nguyen
published 4.5
4.07
Sara Wilks
published
3.97
Kimberly Elliott
usually #4 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.95
Kristin Barnes
published
3.78
Hannah Story
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Elliott + Hannah Watson2344% gamesnot enough data
Alex Kornajcik + Emma Nguyen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Hannah Watson
28W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
4.69
Melissa Ariza
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
4.48
4.5
Alex Kornajcik
62W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
Melissa Stryker
72W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Anna Schraer
21W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Clothilde Thirouin
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Emma Nguyen
43W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Wilks
38W–17L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
Kimberly Elliott
176W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.97
Kristin Barnes
37W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
3.5
Hannah Story
55W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.