Teams

GEPTA/Friedl/40&over/8.0MX/WC

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Artemisa Ortega
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Brandon Silverstein
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 4
3.64
Beatrice Maese
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published 4
Elzie Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Erika Avila
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #2 Singles 26% · published
Jammie Price
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Jared Nieman
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jorge Chavez
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Jose Maese
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Rocio Molina
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Selena Solis
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susana Elias
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Vianka Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Will Silverstein
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Will Silverstein + Marco Gonzalez Friedl5545% gamesnot enough data
Vianka Sanchez + Artemisa Ortega9064% gamesnot enough data
Susana Elias + Brandon Silverstein4351% gamesnot enough data
Vianka Sanchez + Elzie Johnson5159% gamesnot enough data
Rocio Molina + Beatrice Maese1444% gamesnot enough data
Vianka Sanchez + Susana Elias404 matchesnot enough data
Jorge Chavez + Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca404 matchesnot enough data
Rocio Molina + Brandon Silverstein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Artemisa Ortega
51W–49L career · 18 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Brandon Silverstein
77W–49L career · 28 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Beatrice Maese
74W–86L career · 17 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Elzie Johnson
124W–75L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erika Avila
72W–37L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jammie Price
47W–41L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jared Nieman
17W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jorge Chavez
65W–38L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jose Maese
46W–64L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
83W–113L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
44W–34L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rocio Molina
78W–48L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Selena Solis
96W–102L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susana Elias
108W–65L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vianka Sanchez
67W–50L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Will Silverstein
48W–27L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.