Teams

Katina Netmares

2026 PAVO LOCO · 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Phantom Forehands - Senters40102580
2Nightmare on Net Street226613105
3Camp Crystal Ace225715124
4Katina Netmares043920137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Katelyn Meckes
published
2.84
Shyen Shah
published
Gary SALAMONE
published 3
2.73
Donald Walton
published 3
2.64
Katie Landon
published
2.61
2.55
Shama Hinard
published
2.44
David Bupte
published 2.5
2.26
Niki Moss
published
2.23
Tina Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlotte Nickerson + Katie Landon213 matchesnot enough data
Shama Hinard + Katie Landon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katelyn Meckes
31W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
Shyen Shah
39W–44L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Gary SALAMONE
22W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Donald Walton
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Katie Landon
22W–23L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Elizabeth Wyndham
10W–39L career · type S · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
Shama Hinard
26W–43L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
David Bupte
6W–20L career · no lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.44
Niki Moss
14W–31L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
3
Charlotte Nickerson
12W–21L career · no lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.23
Tina Smith
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.