Teams

LTA-P GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-12vs BTA-C NAVYLost 14
L#1 DoublesJohn Lopez / Justin Oberndorf vs Francisco Guevara / Ryan Durfee6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Champe vs JP Reinhard2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLong Tran / Esteban Yunis vs John Koval / Niels Damrauer7-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Tulloch vs Stuart Dimson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTim Bator / Jim Hemenway vs Bill Dietz / Reed Mayne3-6, 1-6
2026-05-11vs TTA BLACKLost 23
W#1 DoublesMichael Lax / Esteban Yunis vs David Mead / Juan Lucero3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJohn Lopez vs Andy Roemersberger4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJustin Oberndorf / Long Tran vs Jeffrey Galloway / Steven Lee5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Tulloch vs Dave Kulmann5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTim Bator / Steven Longenecker vs Rich Marks / Mark Walter6-2, 6-3
2026-04-28vs NJ NAVYWon 32
L#1 DoublesJim Hemenway / Steven Longenecker vs Craig Krastins / Nick Schulte6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPeter Champe vs Bryce Engen6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Lax / Jeffrey Tulloch vs Jim Burgert / Dominic Perea6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJohn Lopez vs Nick Eccles3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLong Tran / Justin Oberndorf vs Rick Brown / Kenneth Earl6-4, 6-3
2026-04-21vs BTA-C NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesPeter Champe / Michael Lax vs JP Reinhard / Francisco Guevara1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEsteban Yunis vs Woody Rubin0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJim Hemenway / Long Tran vs Bill Dietz / James Esson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Tulloch vs Ryan Durfee5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-04-14vs TTA BLACKWon 32
L#1 DoublesJim Hemenway / Justin Oberndorf vs Dave Kulmann / David Mead6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Tulloch vs Andy Roemersberger7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTim Bator / Steven Longenecker vs Toua Vang / Andy Floyd0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPeter Champe vs Juan Lucero6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLong Tran / Michael Lax vs Frederick Longobricco / Rich Marks6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTC-D RED70211434290
2CK RED61241131285
3WC GOLD61221334320
4BTA-C NAVY51201026240
5BTA-F RED43201532258
6DCHS BLUE43181737309
7FOX SILVER43191639302
8CP BRONZE34161943332
9LTA-P GREEN2391635257
10TTA BLACK24141636270
11BTA-C ORANGE24111944304
12DCHS GOLD25142149356
13PH GOLD25112452369
14KC-CC NAVY25112455362
15EM GOLD2592655363
16VCC BLUE16142147361
17HV BLACK16102555385
18BRMST BLACK1692658397

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jeffrey Tulloch
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.33
Jim Hemenway
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
John Lopez
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.22
Peter Champe
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Justin Oberndorf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Tim Bator
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Michael Lax
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.07
Steven Longenecker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.07
Esteban Yunis
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Long Tran
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Longenecker + Tim Bator4153% games+5.7% vs expected
Michael Lax + Steven Longenecker4448% games−0.2% vs expected
Jim Hemenway + Steven Longenecker4355% gamesnot enough data
Justin Oberndorf + Steven Longenecker314 matchesnot enough data
John Lopez + Jim Hemenway303 matchesnot enough data
Justin Oberndorf + Long Tran123 matchesnot enough data
Long Tran + Jim Hemenway123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Lax + Peter Champe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Tulloch
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Jim Hemenway
36W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
John Lopez
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Peter Champe
33W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Justin Oberndorf
49W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Tim Bator
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Michael Lax
22W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Steven Longenecker
72W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.07
3.5
Esteban Yunis
5W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Long Tran
26W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.