Teams

MEA PINK

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-01vs CVTA YELLOWWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsay Sutula vs Michelle Karr6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNatalia Harms vs Beth Marvel6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-05-25Won 20
W#1 SinglesLindsay Sutula vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNatalia Harms / Kim Zoller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-18vs RCC GREENLost 01
L#2 SinglesLindsay Sutula vs Karen Boisnard1-6, 4-6
2023-05-11vs TTA-E BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnne Murphy / Natalia Harms vs Kaylee Henley / Tara Tovar5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMegan Murray vs Stephanie Saunders6-2, 6-4
2023-05-04vs BTA-C REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesSally Hatcher / Natalia Harms vs Judy Therond / Sara McEvoy6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMegan Murray vs Kendra Seoane7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-27vs RMTC PINKWon 20
W#2 SinglesLindsay Sutula vs Jenny Bach7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesColleen Harvey / Natalia Harms vs Roseanne Amoils / Damaris Ayuso6-4, 6-4
2023-04-20vs LTA-Q ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalia Harms / Anne Murphy vs Janphen Jaktupat / Rebekah Harvey4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Natalia Harms
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Megan Murray
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Colleen Harvey
published 3.5
3.24
Ridgley Straka
published
3.16
Kim Zoller
published
3.11
Lindsay Sutula
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Brenda Ellis
published 3
2.84
Debbe Welsh
published 3
2.73
Anne Murphy
published 3
Sally Hatcher
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Natalia Harms
49W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Megan Murray
153W–123L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Colleen Harvey
15W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Ridgley Straka
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Kim Zoller
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Lindsay Sutula
45W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Brenda Ellis
23W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Debbe Welsh
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Anne Murphy
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
2.73
Sally Hatcher
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.