Teams

NWillis (Park Road)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Sat AM

9 players · average NTRP 4.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-18vs MPettit (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Kim Cochran6-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDorothy Cato vs Margy Pettit6-4, 6-3
2026-07-11vs MPettit (OPRC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesMonica Erb vs Carolyn Drake6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDorothy Cato vs Caroline Pickup6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJulie Busha vs Elizabeth Super6-2, 6-2
2026-07-03vs MPettit (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesJane Sickles vs Kim Cochran1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Liz Ostrow1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-27vs MPettit (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDorothy Cato vs Liz Ostrow1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJulie Busha vs Caroline Pickup3-6, 0-6
2026-06-13vs MPettit (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesMonica Erb vs Carolyn Drake6-7, 5-4
L#2 SinglesChristina Peterson vs Jennifer Gardiner3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJulie Busha vs Suzy Johnson6-3, 7-5
2026-06-06vs MPettit (OPRC)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Kim Cochran1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJane Sickles vs Courtney Reynolds7-6, 7-5
L#3 SinglesJulie Busha vs Liz Ostrow6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 40 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Sat AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MPettit (OPRC)429920142
2NWillis (Park Road)2481023184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Monica Erb
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Nicole Yudin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Meredith Sweeney
published
3.96
Christina Peterson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Chelse Stevens
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.91
Dorothy Cato
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Julie Busha
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.79
Nily Willis
published 4
3.72
Jane Sickles
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Sickles + Nily Willis12458% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Monica Erb
97W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Nicole Yudin
48W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Meredith Sweeney
94W–52L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.07
4.5
Christina Peterson
65W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Chelse Stevens
136W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4.5
Dorothy Cato
53W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.91
Julie Busha
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Nily Willis
100W–79L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Jane Sickles
103W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.