Teams

Get a Grip

Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women - Bucks County

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-09vs Peace, Love and TennisLost 03
L#1 DoublesPam Chlad / Margaret Basile vs Carolyn Cerasi / Mary Guilfoyle5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSherri Willenbecher vs Cynthia Mobley2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElise Roma / Christine Segal vs Lori Gotzis / Julie Post3-6, 1-6
2021-05-26vs Game, Set, MaskWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Grey / Margaret Basile vs Suzanna Duffy / Heather Mastroni2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSherri Willenbecher vs Sheri Keiles7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElise Roma / Laura Waters vs Ellen Schlackman / Deborah Winokur6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-28vs Game, Set, MaskLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Jarvis / Laura Waters vs Heather Mastroni / Suzanna Duffy1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSherri Willenbecher vs Deborah Winokur6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKrupaa Lakshmi Visweswara / Julie Grey vs Sheri Keiles / Robin Rosman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-14vs Peace, Love and TennisLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherri Willenbecher / Laura Waters vs Hildy Bothwell / Elizabeth Darcy1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBarbara Jarvis vs Cynthia Mobley2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElise Roma / Julie Grey vs Carolyn Cerasi / Lisa Morrash6-8, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women - Bucks County have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Barbara Jarvis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.47
Sherri Willenbecher
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Elise Roma
usually #4 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
Christine Segal
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Julie Grey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Krupaa Lakshmi Visweswara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Waters
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Margaret Basile
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Pam Chlad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Waters + Elise Roma32335% games−6.5% vs expected
Christine Segal + Elise Roma21038% gamesnot enough data
Pam Chlad + Elise Roma1833% gamesnot enough data
Christine Segal + Pam Chlad134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barbara Jarvis
14W–27L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
Sherri Willenbecher
40W–89L career · 12 lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
Elise Roma
10W–48L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Christine Segal
3W–18L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Grey
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Krupaa Lakshmi Visweswara
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Laura Waters
8W–37L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Margaret Basile
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pam Chlad
8W–43L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.