Teams

6 Bon Air Steele

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-18vs 2 MAC SnowLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Henry Wood vs Eric Spivack / Stuart McCroskey6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2021-06-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Henry Wood vs Zachary King / Matthew Haga3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Wade / Grant Slegowski vs Mark Holland / Christopher Corts7-5, 6-4
2021-05-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Huffman / Grant Slegowski vs Glenn Dubiel / Tim Bereika7-5, 6-1
2021-05-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Henry Wood vs Charles Wayland / Mark Schwartz6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTimothy Wade / Michael Blackburn vs Stuart Fulcher / James Lawrence4-6, 4-6
2021-04-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Timothy Wade vs Chris Grinnell / Brad Burch2-6, 1-6
2021-04-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesGrant Slegowski / Christopher Wade vs Scott Gunter / Geordie Stewart7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anthony Fiorenza
published 4.5
4.23
Tom Bryan
published
4.17
Dale Nowery
published 4.5
4.15
Gary Farrar
published 4.5
4.12
Christopher Wade
published 4
3.97
Grant Slegowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
David Dwight
published 4
3.82
Henry Wood
published 4
3.59
Michael Blackburn
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.55
Timothy Wade
published
Thomas Huffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Bryan + Gary Farrar4161% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anthony Fiorenza
11W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tom Bryan
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Dale Nowery
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Gary Farrar
7W–3L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Christopher Wade
9W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%19%81%
4.12
4.5
Grant Slegowski
153W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
David Dwight
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Henry Wood
13W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Michael Blackburn
172W–174L career · 7 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
Timothy Wade
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Thomas Huffman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.