Teams

DIABLO CC CW5.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 5.5

23 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-30vs MORAGA VALLEY CW5.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily McCorduck / Taylor Gibson vs Shirley McLaughlin / Nicole Carter Mcgill6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJackie Malakoff / Chika Lewandowski vs Sarah Roufa / Elizabeth Ackerman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Gherlone / Shelby Miller vs Meghan Jacobowitz / Kristen Mannix3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-10-09vs MORAGA VALLEY CW5.5A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesSara Parr / Maryam Mercado vs Jessica Britanik / Katherine Young0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Bantz / Alix Allocco vs Sarah Roufa / Nicole Carter Mcgill6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Green / Jenee Rehrmann vs Ashley Edmonds / Elizabeth Ackerman6-4, 6-4
2025-09-04vs MORAGA VALLEY CW5.5A-DTSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlix Allocco / Carla Forgham vs Ashley Edmonds / Katherine Young3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarisa Ferraioli / Shelby Miller vs Meghan Jacobowitz / Elizabeth Ackerman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Carisa Ferraioli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Tara Beane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Katy Drucker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Chika Lewandowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Kelly Feinstein
published
2.87
Jenee Rehrmann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Erika Woolley
published
2.85
Alix Allocco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Sara Parr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Carla Forgham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Dana Brent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Dana Pingatore
published 3
2.72
Michelle Gherlone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Sarah Bantz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Emily McCorduck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Natalie Denning
published
2.38
Taylor Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Jackie Malakoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Hoge Megan
published
Dana Gold
published 2.5
Leslie Keane
published
Maryam Mercado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shelby Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Bantz + Erika Woolley4160% gamesnot enough data
Dana Brent + Tara Beane213 matchesnot enough data
Carisa Ferraioli + Kelly Feinstein303 matchesnot enough data
Carla Forgham + Erika Woolley213 matchesnot enough data
Carla Forgham + Michelle Gherlone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carisa Ferraioli
12W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Tara Beane
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.97
Katy Drucker
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.95
3
Chika Lewandowski
6W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kelly Feinstein
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Jenee Rehrmann
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Erika Woolley
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.85
3
Alix Allocco
12W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Sara Parr
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
3
Carla Forgham
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dana Brent
14W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Dana Pingatore
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Michelle Gherlone
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%6%94%
2.72
Sarah Bantz
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%6%94%
2.71
Emily McCorduck
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
Natalie Denning
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Taylor Gibson
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Jackie Malakoff
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Hoge Megan
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Dana Gold
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Keane
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maryam Mercado
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shelby Miller
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.