Teams

LLKI-King/HNP

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Men 8.5 Saturday

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-28vs LKHA-Haynes/CSD SPARTAN 40+ 8.5 SatSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJosh Goldblatt / Chris Bauer vs Ravi Mujumdar / Corey Cornacchio6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDuane Johnson / Raj Voleti vs Steven Kayton / Thomas Andrews6-7, 4-6
2024-09-17vs LDWI-Winton/LNRCWon 10
W#1 DoublesOmar Punjabi / Prakhar Paharia vs Charles Quinn / Tom Gibbs6-3, 6-3
2024-09-14vs LSSR-Sree/NMP/8540+Won 20
W#1 DoublesLance King / Ragu Gopalan vs Hao Dang / Matthew Borcich6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesOmar Punjabi / Raj Voleti vs Sreejith Sreedharan / Nate Roller6-3, 6-2
2024-09-02vs LPKU-Kumar/PAC 85_40Won 30
W#1 DoublesChris Bauer / Josh Goldblatt vs Yeshpal Lakkadi / Jack Horowitz6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDuane Johnson / Raj Voleti vs Srinivasa Movva / Justin Brynn6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRagu Gopalan / Almon Barnwell vs Samuel Kopchick / Manuel Rios7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-08-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesOmar Punjabi / Ragu Gopalan vs Baker Arrowood / Michael Flanagan6-2, 6-3
2024-08-17vs LSRE-Reynolds/Peninsula 8.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesJosh Goldblatt / Jawad Shoaib vs Mike McMahon / Alfu Miah6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Chris Bauer
published 4.5
4.31
Raj Voleti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Josh Goldblatt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Omar Punjabi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Lance King
published
3.96
Ragu Gopalan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.96
Prakhar Paharia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Marcus Phillips
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raj Voleti + Omar Punjabi19562% games+5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Bauer
19W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Raj Voleti
213W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Josh Goldblatt
150W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Omar Punjabi
66W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Lance King
24W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Ragu Gopalan
113W–40L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Prakhar Paharia
189W–56L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
Marcus Phillips
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.