Teams

KY/LEX/Smith

2024 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/ROSS9142823317
2KY/LEX/Smith91401027352
3KY/LEX/Rondon55232763473
4KY/LEX/Michael/Lauder27172862439

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Santiago Bravo
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.46
Jon Terry
published
3.44
Jacob Senters
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.41
Martin Summers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Patrick Hancock
published
3.33
Ryan McQuerry
published
3.33
Derrick Smith
published 3.5
3.17
Johan Graham
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.07
Mark Vinas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Morgan Cordray
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Neil Whitman
published
Ric Hernandez
published
Ronald Eckstein
published
Tristan Cheam
published
Zachary Botts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Senters + Martin Summers3253% games+8.9% vs expected
Patrick Hancock + Derrick Smith4257% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Hancock + Jon Terry3261% gamesnot enough data
Morgan Cordray + Derrick Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Vinas + Derrick Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Vinas + Patrick Hancock303 matchesnot enough data
Mark Vinas + Ric Hernandez213 matchesnot enough data
Derrick Smith + Ric Hernandez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Santiago Bravo
35W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Jon Terry
45W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Jacob Senters
18W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Martin Summers
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Patrick Hancock
42W–38L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Ryan McQuerry
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Derrick Smith
43W–39L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
Johan Graham
15W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Mark Vinas
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Morgan Cordray
9W–25L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Neil Whitman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ric Hernandez
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ronald Eckstein
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tristan Cheam
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zachary Botts
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.