Teams

Team 14 Love & Learn

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-29vs Team 21 ANCC 2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Stein / Xiaoli Liang vs Laura Johnson / Tonya Singer6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-10vs Team 8 Haven AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesXiaoli Liang / Jennifer Miles vs Katharine Kastens / Gretchen Hobbs0-6, 1-6
2025-02-20vs Team 2 Loosely StrungWon 10
W#1 DoublesNa Liu / Xiaoli Liang vs Lisa White / Kimberly McPhee6-4, 6-3
2025-02-07vs Team 13 Power BallersWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Dumas / Vicky Bach vs Taylor Lothliam / Jennifer Bothwell6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracye Duffin / Lihang Ren vs Deanna Busteed / Mona Hans3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTania Krissel / Na Liu vs Gayle Balba / Julia Maggiano6-3, 6-4
2025-01-08vs Team 11 Great FallsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdriana Lee / Xiaoli Liang vs Karen McNeice / Kristy Mathey6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-01-04vs Team 9 Arctic AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly King / Xiaoli Liang vs Nicole Dougherty / Kim Hovda2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Lihang Ren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Adriana Lee
published 3
3.02
Albert Crenshaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Xiaoli Liang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Pamela Stein
published
Anette Andersson
published 3
2.69
Sanam Boroumand
published
2.69
Tracye Duffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Jennifer Miles
published
Leslie Dumas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Na Liu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tania Krissel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vicky Bach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Stein + Xiaoli Liang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lihang Ren
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Adriana Lee
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Albert Crenshaw
54W–159L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Xiaoli Liang
46W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Pamela Stein
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Anette Andersson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sanam Boroumand
7W–25L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Tracye Duffin
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jennifer Miles
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Leslie Dumas
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Na Liu
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tania Krissel
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vicky Bach
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.