Teams

Woodlake Cooksey

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-17vs HCC Lines 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Zielinski / Kara Key vs Susan Mangin / Betsy Kersey6-4, 7-6
2022-06-15vs ACAC CraneLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Zielinski / Kara Key vs Ashlyn DesMarteau / Kim Smith3-6, 1-6
2022-06-10vs Kings Charter RamserLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Zielinski / Tammy McGowan vs Donna Mourtzakis / Victoria Galiffa6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-03vs CCV Goodwin-LevyLost 01
L#1 SinglesCindy Birnbaum vs Kim Cressy7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-01Won 20
W#1 SinglesLaurie Cooksey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Zielinski / Carol Beth Cook vs Margaret Nuckols-Currence / Stephanie Tefel6-3, 6-1
2022-05-27vs WOCC StringerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCindy Birnbaum vs Stephanie Burnside6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Zielinski / Karen ODonnell vs Morgan Hutter / Sue Dibert6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-25vs SCC- AndrewsWon 10
W#1 SinglesCindy Birnbaum vs Becky McNeer7-6, 6-3
2022-05-20vs TDC SpillareSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCindy Birnbaum vs Stephanie Marcus1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDianne Revelle / Laurie Cooksey vs Erica Bragg / Elizabeth Walkley1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Cindy Birnbaum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Karen ODonnell
published
3.18
Carol Beth Cook
published 3.5
3.12
Robin Oldt
published
3.09
Susan Zielinski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Kara Key
published
3.07
Tammy McGowan
published
2.85
Lim Han
published
2.84
Laurie Cooksey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.83
Dianne Revelle
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Zielinski + Cindy Birnbaum2540% games−2.1% vs expected
Laurie Cooksey + Cindy Birnbaum111250% gamesnot enough data
Susan Zielinski + Laurie Cooksey51044% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Birnbaum
205W–155L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Karen ODonnell
16W–25L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Carol Beth Cook
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Robin Oldt
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Susan Zielinski
125W–157L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Kara Key
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Tammy McGowan
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
Lim Han
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Laurie Cooksey
123W–152L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Dianne Revelle
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.