Teams

HMTC

2023 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-29vs CSU GOLDLost 12
W#1 DoublesStacey Fox / Sandra Barnes vs Pat Murphy-Ebersole / Kristen Fahrner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatheryn Hill vs Kayla Gosz6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Stout / Teresa Adsit vs Julia Tynan / Aileen VanMeveren1-6, 1-6
2023-04-22vs CSU GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Frisch / Wendy Ball vs Tracy Hutton / Layne Martin0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKatheryn Hill vs Marie Massey1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Stacey Fox vs Erin Dirvonas / Brittney Stephenson1-6, 5-7
2023-04-08vs TAGLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacey Fox / Wendy Ball vs Larea Warden / Janet Crespin2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTeresa Adsit vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Barnes / Katheryn Hill vs Joyce Hirano-Kuznik / Lisa Novacek4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-01vs FCCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudy Stout / Sandra Barnes vs June Ellen Feil / Sandra Lautzenheiser0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKatheryn Hill vs Lisa Olsen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Frisch / Wendy Ball vs Jane Gronewoller / Karen Dunbar7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FCCC316614114
2MLF22751196
3HMTC237818137
4CSU237819133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Kristen Frisch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Stacey Fox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Katheryn Hill
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Teresa Adsit
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Wendy Ball
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Judy Stout
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Adsit + Judy Stout1532% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Ball + Stacey Fox1428% gamesnot enough data
Judy Stout + Kristen Frisch033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristen Frisch
74W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Stacey Fox
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Katheryn Hill
47W–55L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
3
Teresa Adsit
81W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
2.91
Wendy Ball
13W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Judy Stout
35W–126L career · 2 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.