Teams

Yadkin/Francis/40+3.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Singles 40 & Over · Women 3.5 - Thursday Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-17vs Yadkin/Haynes/40+ 3.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesNancy Hart vs Mildred Schultz3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMary Lancaster vs Sarah Eugenia Gallo0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAshley Givens vs JoAnn White2-6, 4-6
2026-07-23vs Yadkin/Haynes/40+ 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesRebecca Hartsough vs Meghan de Young1-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesNikki Francis vs Danielle Wright5-7, 0-6
2026-07-16vs Yadkin/Talbott/40+3.5Won 20
W#2 SinglesNancy Hart vs Christina Soriano6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesNikki Francis vs Deana Georgitis6-1, 6-4
2026-07-12vs Yadkin/Haynes/40+ 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKelly Gould vs Laura Varsik6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNancy Hart vs Mildred Schultz1-6, 4-6
2026-07-08vs Yadkin/Haynes/40+ 3.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesRebecca Hartsough vs Lindsay Reynolds7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNikki Francis vs Clarissa Tatum2-6, 1-6
2026-07-02vs Yadkin/Talbott/40+3.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesAshley Givens vs Tammy LaValley6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesNikki Francis vs Amy Starnes4-6, 3-6
2026-06-04vs Yadkin/Talbott/40+3.5Won 21
L#1 SinglesRebecca Hartsough vs Jenny Orr6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMary Lancaster vs Samantha Talbott2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAshley Givens vs Tammy LaValley6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.5 - Thursday Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Haynes/40+ 3.560162590
2Yadkin/Talbott/40+3.52471124150
3Yadkin/Francis/40+3.52661838251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Rebecca Hartsough
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Kelly Gould
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.24
Mary Lancaster
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Nancy Hart
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.97
Ashley Givens
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.91
Nikki Francis
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Natalie Jennings
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Hartsough
40W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Kelly Gould
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Mary Lancaster
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Nancy Hart
33W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Ashley Givens
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Nikki Francis
16W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Natalie Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.