← Teams

PTC-Lee/Irvin

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Rachel Novak
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Cathleen Lang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Kelsey McGinnis
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Karen Barks
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.26
Gretchen Newcomb
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Lia Irvin
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
—
Lyudmila Leissler
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.84
Valerie Neill
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Karen Kraus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-03-19Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesCathleen Lang / Lia Irvin vs Jennifer Woodard / Kathy Ramsey3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Adina Talpos6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Novak / Danica Lee vs Janice Ackley / Nozomi Bray6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSarah Larson / Karen Kraus vs Tila Parker / Linda Degnan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-18Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesRachel Novak / Danica Lee vs Deb Garris / Janae Pyle6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Lori Bernhardt2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathleen Lang / Gretchen Newcomb vs Laura Laney / Kim Wright5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Larson / Valerie Neill vs Alison Davis / Catherine Leedy6-0, 6-1
2023-03-12Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesElise D Harvey / Gretchen Newcomb vs Lupine Swanson / Susan Browning6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDanica Lee / Valerie Neill vs Kendra Rothert / Rachel Nies7-5, 5-4
W#2 SinglesKelsey McGinnis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-04Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesLia Irvin / Rachel Novak vs Vicki Blunt / Heidi Palena6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLyudmila Leissler / Gretchen Newcomb vs Pamela Minor / Angela Benedict6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKelsey McGinnis vs Deborah Self6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSarah Larson / Karen Kraus vs Tamara Phillips / Susan McMullin6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-02-12Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesLyudmila Leissler / Cathleen Lang vs Andrea Yao / Laura Rundle6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Heather Lee6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Novak / Gretchen Newcomb vs Jenna Dornblaser / Parul Saxena1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElise D Harvey / Valerie Neill vs Patty Chen / Jill Boyce6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-02-03Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesCathleen Lang / Elise D Harvey vs Carly Vendegna / Kari Hastings6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Cindy del Rosario1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Barks / Danica Lee vs Parish Burns / Maya Mori4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesValerie Neill / Danielle Hartzog vs Joy Meyers / Elizabeth Schwarz7-5, 6-3
2023-01-22Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesDanielle Hartzog / Karen Barks vs Heather Lee / Constance Erickson6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Jill Boyce6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathleen Lang / Elise D Harvey vs Chiharu Olsson / Woohyung Kim7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Sabine Verbiest5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-01-14Lost 1–4
L#1 DoublesKaren Barks / Danielle Hartzog vs Jeri Finn / Diane Malhotra6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Anna Holowetzki6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDanica Lee / Rachel Novak vs Elizabeth Burns / Edwardeen Hilts6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesKelsey McGinnis vs Rebe Colasurdo6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Tammy Cofield / Sara Crate6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Rachel Novak
71W–39L career
1%98%0%
3.73
3.5
Cathleen Lang
67W–68L career
0%68%32%
3.55
3.5
Kelsey McGinnis
49W–21L career
1%85%14%
3.40
3.5
Karen Barks
35W–20L career
0%97%3%
3.33
3.5
Gretchen Newcomb
49W–70L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Lia Irvin
63W–43L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Lyudmila Leissler
69W–45L career
not enough data
—
3
Valerie Neill
48W–76L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Karen Kraus
79W–102L career
0%97%2%
2.84

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.