Teams

No Strings Attached

2022 Adult 40 and Over League · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-05vs BTCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHarold Grey / Neal Mitsuyoshi vs Douglas Smith / David Andrew7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSanford Beppu vs Gale Ching6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJames Burkhart / Mark Leonard vs Lloyd Chaffin / Bill Ota6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDonte Boyd / Ray Gomez vs Richard Turbin / Ed Zajac2-6, 2-6
2022-02-26vs Lob CityLost 14
W#1 DoublesHarold Grey / Neal Mitsuyoshi vs Al Harjati / Eric Youn7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDonald Geil vs Ryan Santo1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTuan Tran / Mark Leonard vs Bennett Chin / Kevin Inn6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSanford Beppu vs Christopher Hong4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJames Burkhart / Randy Neal vs Franklin Salonga / Trong Son0-6, 1-6
2022-02-12vs Tennis 4 FunLost 05
L#1 DoublesRandy Neal / Donald Geil vs David Choy / Melvin Toledo1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMassimo Silivestro vs Charles Dun3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHarold Grey / Tuan Tran vs Jayson Alhambra / Dave Mark2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSanford Beppu vs Glen Hayashida4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonte Boyd / Ray Gomez vs Lionel Barona / Russell Choy0-6, 1-6
2022-02-05vs OC Men 4.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesNeal Mitsuyoshi / Harold Grey vs David Abrass / Leo Noecker7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMassimo Silivestro vs Arthur Martirosian6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTuan Tran / Donte Boyd vs Greg Cleland / Lee Conching3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSanford Beppu vs John Creighton Miller1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJames Burkhart / Mark Leonard vs Scott Wong / Jeffrey Benz3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-01-29vs Tennis The MenaceLost 14
W#1 DoublesHarold Grey / Neal Mitsuyoshi vs Darryl Yap / Anthony Chun6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDonald Geil vs Douglas Simmons1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTuan Tran / James Burkhart vs Gerald Lau / Gilbert Fernandes6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSanford Beppu vs Andres Libed3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRay Gomez / Randy Neal vs Barry Nakasone / Hiram Pajo1-6, 4-6
2022-01-22vs MDPLost 23
W#1 DoublesHarold Grey / Neal Mitsuyoshi vs Alan Lum / Dexter Osato6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMassimo Silivestro vs Alfred Chow6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTuan Tran / James Burkhart vs Craig Pang / Brian Gretz1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDonald Geil vs James Horiuchi2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMark Leonard / Randy Neal vs Cy Yamamoto / Paul Navarro0-6, 0-6
2022-01-15vs KRC Kanaha PlusLost 05
L#1 DoublesTuan Tran / Mark Leonard vs Millard Brown / Blake Goodman2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMassimo Silivestro vs Mohammed Qureshi6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Burkhart / Donte Boyd vs David Evans / Justin Endicott4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSanford Beppu vs David Pascua4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRay Gomez / Randy Neal vs Curtis Leong / Ian Greene1-6, 0-6
2022-01-08vs Hawaii/Pasicaran/40&Over4.0MLost 14
L#1 DoublesHarold Grey / Tuan Tran vs Warlo Pasicaran / Benny Toledo5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSanford Beppu vs Grant Migita6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNeal Mitsuyoshi / Mark Leonard vs Aaron Yamato / Roy Morigawara7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMassimo Silivestro vs Jilbert Salamanca4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRay Gomez / Donte Boyd vs Eric Ganibe / Daniel Medina1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Harold Grey
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.62
Neal Mitsuyoshi
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.46
James Burkhart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Donald Geil
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Mark Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Donte Boyd
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Massimo Silivestro
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Randy Neal
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Ray Gomez
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Sanford Beppu
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Leonard + James Burkhart4942% games+2.0% vs expected
Neal Mitsuyoshi + Harold Grey7950% games−5.3% vs expected
Ray Gomez + Randy Neal134 matchesnot enough data
James Burkhart + Randy Neal044 matchesnot enough data
Donte Boyd + Ray Gomez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Harold Grey
26W–46L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Neal Mitsuyoshi
30W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
James Burkhart
64W–128L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Donald Geil
84W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Mark Leonard
92W–169L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Donte Boyd
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Massimo Silivestro
15W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Neal
3W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ray Gomez
15W–95L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sanford Beppu
22W–38L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.