Teams

BHSC-McCulloch

2023 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-05-17vs KeswickWon 10
W#3 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Michelle Holzwarth vs Sharon Merrick / Merrill Strange6-4, 6-3
2023-05-03vs SweetspotsLost 01
L#2 SinglesJannemieke Keener vs Karin Jones5-7, 5-7
2023-04-17vs Forest LakesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Michelle Holzwarth vs Shauna Hogg / Beth Kohler6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Christina Nicholaou
published 3.5
3.22
Courtney Heyward
published 3.5
3.16
Julie McCulloch
published
3.14
Megan Wyant
published
3.10
Mary McFarland
published 3.5
3.10
Rachel Swartz
published
2.92
Linda Jordan
published
2.90
2.85
Karen Overman
published
2.81
Jannemieke Keener
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Laura Pietro
published
Susan McConnell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Nicholaou
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Courtney Heyward
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Julie McCulloch
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.16
Megan Wyant
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Mary McFarland
31W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Rachel Swartz
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Linda Jordan
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Gretchen Masselli
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Karen Overman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Jannemieke Keener
56W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Laura Pietro
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan McConnell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.