Teams

Kingwood CC - Robinson

Adult 18 & Over 2.5W - 5.0+ Women's Friday Day · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.44 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Becky Deitz
published 4
3.35
Penny Smith-Hill
published
3.33
Susan Descioli
published
3.28
Megan Coney
published
3.28
Ashley Hurlbert
published 3.5
3.25
Beth MacE
published 3.5
3.22
Janis Savatsky
published
3.20
Cynthia Fuller
published 3.5
3.11
Eileen Radcliffe
published 3.5
3.00
Amy Bennett
published 3.5
2.82
Brittany Love
published 3
Kerri Roberson
published
Kimberly Hurlbert
published
Leanne Armel
published
Patty Matson
published
Tanya Robinson
published
Teri Cooper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Smith-Hill + Cynthia Fuller9555% games+2.9% vs expected
Teri Cooper + Patty Matson3253% gamesnot enough data
Susan Descioli + Beth MacE2346% gamesnot enough data
Susan Descioli + Eileen Radcliffe1439% gamesnot enough data
Becky Deitz + Kerri Roberson224 matchesnot enough data
Teri Cooper + Eileen Radcliffe303 matchesnot enough data
Janis Savatsky + Susan Descioli123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becky Deitz
23W–36L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Penny Smith-Hill
57W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Susan Descioli
23W–45L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Megan Coney
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Ashley Hurlbert
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Beth MacE
13W–26L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Janis Savatsky
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cynthia Fuller
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Eileen Radcliffe
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Amy Bennett
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Anne-Marie Kapoor
8W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Brittany Love
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kerri Roberson
11W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Hurlbert
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leanne Armel
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patty Matson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tanya Robinson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teri Cooper
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.