Teams

RCC RED

2022 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-16vs NJ PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Rosen / Heather Wilson vs Amanda Hurst / Eve Wall0-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesWindy Cook vs Michelle Halliday7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNina Neill / Michele Gosselin vs Lauren Rivas / Jill Mendoza2-6, 4-6
2022-04-09vs NJ REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDebra Masters / Michele Gosselin vs Suzanne Watkins / Anne Perry6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllyson Horvath / Heather Wilson vs Natasha Uecker / Emese Nagy4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-02vs NJ YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Rosen / Heather Wilson vs Jessica Mitchell / Mary Virginia Simpson4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAllyson Horvath vs Colleen McClary6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesWindy Cook / Sarah Campbell vs Christa Dobbs / Shelley Flood0-6, 6-7
2022-03-26vs NJ BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Campbell / Elisabeth Rosen vs Caryn Moller / Diana Guettlein3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAllyson Horvath vs Megan Shibao6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDebra Masters / Julie Redlinger vs Kimberly Bonczynski / Kim Melvin5-7, 1-6
2022-03-19vs MC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele Gosselin / Sarah Campbell vs Shannon Mooney / Mirela Bacria6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesWindy Cook vs Terming Chew6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Rosen / Julie Redlinger vs Susan Bolton / Mary Hogan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Michele Gosselin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Allyson Horvath
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Debra Masters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Windy Cook
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Julie Redlinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Sarah Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elisabeth Rosen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nina Neill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Campbell + Michele Gosselin134 matchesnot enough data
Nina Neill + Julie Redlinger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michele Gosselin
99W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Allyson Horvath
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Debra Masters
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Windy Cook
61W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
Julie Redlinger
8W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
Sarah Campbell
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.16
Elisabeth Rosen
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nina Neill
0W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.