← Teams

MAC-Sinnott

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 2.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Kelly Letourneau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.43
Stephanie Barnes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
—
Harshi Waters
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2024-03-24Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesHarshi Waters / Elizabeth Fox vs Janice Hazel / Xiaobo Dai6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Fox / Kelly Letourneau vs Kelly McDonald / Bridghid McMonagle6-0, 6-1
2024-03-02Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesKelly Letourneau vs Rebecca Vega6-2, 6-0
2024-02-24Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesHarshi Waters / Lisa Hagerman vs Susan Wang / Grace Lim7-5, 6-3
2024-02-18Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesKelly Letourneau vs Annie Lamb6-0, 6-2
2024-02-02Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesHarshi Waters / Kathleen Huffman vs Dana McNeil / Nina Parikh6-0, 6-2
2024-01-20Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesStephanie Barnes vs Joanna Han6-1, 6-3
2024-01-07Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJeanne Sinnott / Kelly Letourneau vs Jaime Hamilton / Dorothy Shin6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Kelly Letourneau
15W–19L career
10%89%0%
2.64
2.5
Stephanie Barnes
16W–41L career
0%57%43%
2.43
2.5
Harshi Waters
22W–25L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.