← Teams

MV-Kucher

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Alex Harbell
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
—
Michael Lemmons
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Nathan Gwin
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
—
Stephanie Harbell
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3
2.69
Kathryn Harlan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Irina Stolerman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.34
Wesley Eader
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
—
Patricia Kuchar
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
—
Randy Walker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results6 ties
2020-11-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNathan Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Christina Bergstrom / Abhisar Gupta7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRandy Walker / Karen Walker vs Allie Mauck / Matt Savage6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Kuchar / Michael Lemmons vs Tyler Grant / Alana Rhea4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-11-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAlex Harbell / Patricia Kuchar vs Arturo Barroso / Rochelle Pluymers6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesWesley Eader / Irina Stolerman vs Rebecca Griffith / Miguel Diaz de Leon6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Lemmons / Kathryn Harlan vs Angela Diaz de Leon / Thomas Bollaert6-1, 6-2
2020-10-25Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesIrina Stolerman / Wesley Eader vs Carol Glenn / Robert Glenn6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Nathan Gwin vs Jane Paulsen / Christian Paulsen6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Kuchar / Michael Lemmons vs Karin Owens / Ryan Owens7-6, 6-3
2020-10-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNathan Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Lauren Stover / Charles Ruhsenberger6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Kuchar / Doug Jones vs Michael Parkhurst / Jennifer Pultz6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesIrina Stolerman / Randy Walker vs Penny Langhammer / David Floyd6-2, 6-0
2020-10-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Nathan Gwin vs Anna Boyarshinova / Ryan Ona6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatricia Kuchar / Alex Harbell vs Betty Roux / Rick Pogue7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesIrina Stolerman / Wesley Eader vs Cindy Bennett / Fred Sutardjo6-4, 6-3
2020-09-19Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesPatricia Kuchar / Doug Jones vs Kim Tellin / WonKyu Kim4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathryn Harlan / Michael Lemmons vs Todd McConachie / Lisa McConachie6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRandy Walker / Karen Walker vs Janna McDougall / Jerome Kline4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alex Harbell
127W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.67
3
Michael Lemmons
25W–30L career
not enough data
—
3
Nathan Gwin
26W–33L career
not enough data
—
3
Stephanie Harbell
70W–26L career
not enough data
—
3
Kathryn Harlan
20W–40L career
14%84%3%
2.69
2.5
Irina Stolerman
24W–47L career
0%34%66%
2.53
2.5
Wesley Eader
55W–103L career · type A
0%79%21%
2.34
0
Patricia Kuchar
24W–44L career
not enough data
—
0
Randy Walker
20W–27L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.