Teams

WI Adult 18&O 2.5 W GML Village Club Huber

2022 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 2.5 GML Women

6 players · average NTRP / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-04vs WI Adult 18&O 2.5 W GML FLACLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Smazal / Susan Schultz vs Amy Pulokas / Sarah Augustson1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMercedes Paz vs Rebecca Greving0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesOlga Huber / Renee LeSage vs Doreen Potter / Beth Ivey1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKim Smazal / Susan Schultz vs Kate Carroll / Heidi Kucharski7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesOlga Huber vs MacKenzie Snow0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRenee LeSage / Ellen Deskins vs Majka Drewitz / Laurie Benkley6-0, 6-1
2022-07-14vs WI Adult 18&O 2.5 W GML FLACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKim Smazal / Renee LeSage vs Julie Klein / Beth Ivey3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMercedes Paz / Susan Schultz vs Debra Klement-Thomas / Colleen MUTCHLER6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRenee LeSage / Susan Schultz vs Heidi Kucharski / MacKenzie Snow2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKaren Moran vs Kate Carroll6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMercedes Paz / Olga Huber vs Majka Drewitz / Laurie Benkley2-6, 1-6
2022-06-23vs WI Adult 18&O 2.5 W GML FLACLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Moran / Renee LeSage vs Amy Pulokas / Rebecca Greving1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Schultz / Mercedes Paz vs Sarah Augustson / Savannah Ferkins0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesKaren Moran / Kim Smazal vs Melissa Klink / Heidi Kucharski6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRenee LeSage / Susan Schultz vs Jocelyn Sulsberger / Majka Drewitz6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 2.5 GML Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 18&O 2.5 W GML FLAC4212617131
2WI Adult 18&O 2.5 W GML Village Club Huber3381022151
3WI Adult 18&O 2.5 W GML Pleasant Valley Klink2461226162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Mercedes Paz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.59
Renee LeSage
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 47% · published
2.39
Susan Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.07
Olga Huber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Karen Moran
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Kim Smazal
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mercedes Paz
6W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Renee LeSage
35W–61L career · 15 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Susan Schultz
2W–13L career · 6 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.39
Olga Huber
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Karen Moran
5W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Smazal
12W–33L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.