Teams

LKWD - Huffty/Barnard

2025 Adult 40 & Over Women Winter Day - Mobile · 3.0 Women Winter Day 40+

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-21vs MTC - BogolinWon 30
W#1 DoublesGini Coody / Katherine Lapeyrouse vs Mitzi Seales / Sandra Reynolds6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDrue Banta vs Laurie Murphy6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Barnard / Debbie Taylor vs Khanh Nguyen / Rebecca Pope6-4, 6-4
2025-02-17vs OW - KinneyLost 23
L#1 DoublesKim Barnard / Stephanie Cain vs Beth Mathison / Laurel Wallace6-4, 3-0
W#1 SinglesJulia Ham vs Joanne Upton6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMARY KNOX Bixler / Gini Coody vs Amy Kendall / Kathy Clark6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Coumanis / Drue Banta vs Susan Nonnenmacher / Theresa Perry6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#4 DoublesParisa Clarke / Jessica Frostholm vs Susan Groom / Sheila Mahoney1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-10vs MO - Hassen/BritainWon 41
W#1 DoublesKimberly Huffty / Debbie Taylor vs Anna Snyder / Emily Trione7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGini Coody vs Jill Hassen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Barnard / Stephanie Cain vs Pamela Britain / Shannon Spinks6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Mccoy / Lisa Coumanis vs Janna Murphy / Stephanie Daniel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesParisa Clarke / Jessica Frostholm vs Kristin Wilson / Semra Nieves6-4, 6-4
2025-02-07vs OW - KinneyWon 50
W#1 DoublesStella Martin / Parisa Clarke vs Amy Kendall / Rachel Reid7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDrue Banta vs Traci Fusaiotti6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Barnard / Stephanie Cain vs Maureen Lowe / Susan Groom6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Huffty / Debbie Taylor vs Laurel Wallace / Susan Eways6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesKatherine Lapeyrouse / Gini Coody vs Theresa Perry / Kathy Clark6-3, 6-3
2025-01-06vs MO - Hassen/BritainSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKimberly Huffty / Debbie Taylor vs Anna Snyder / Joanna Bass7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Coumanis vs Misty Sabol6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKim Barnard / Gini Coody vs Jill Hassen / Emily Trione3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDrue Banta / Julia Ham vs Kimberly Long / Pamela Britain6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Winter Day 40+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Debbie Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Gini Coody
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.08
Lisa Coumanis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.01
Kimberly Graben
published
2.99
MARY KNOX Bixler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Katherine Lapeyrouse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Kimberly Huffty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Kim Barnard
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Stephanie Cain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Drue Banta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.64
Julia Ham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.63
Stella Martin
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Amy Mccoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Jessica Frostholm
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Parisa Clarke
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Cain + Kim Barnard8558% games+15.2% vs expected
Gini Coody + Debbie Taylor3353% games+12.5% vs expected
Kim Barnard + Gini Coody10755% games+2.7% vs expected
Kimberly Huffty + Debbie Taylor16358% games+2.5% vs expected
Stephanie Cain + Gini Coody5066% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Cain + Kimberly Huffty224 matchesnot enough data
Julia Ham + Drue Banta134 matchesnot enough data
Kim Barnard + Kimberly Huffty134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Taylor
107W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Gini Coody
42W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Lisa Coumanis
29W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Kimberly Graben
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
MARY KNOX Bixler
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Katherine Lapeyrouse
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kimberly Huffty
40W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Kim Barnard
42W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Stephanie Cain
25W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Drue Banta
18W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Julia Ham
11W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Stella Martin
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Amy Mccoy
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Jessica Frostholm
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
Parisa Clarke
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.