Teams

SAN JOSE SR 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Shashi Navar
published
3.63
Lara Norman-Stowers
published
3.36
3.26
Janet Arsenault
published
3.21
Jane Ensor
published
3.21
Dana Knapp
published 3.5
3.20
Amanda Holmquist
published 3.5
3.19
Mary Jo Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Jan Immer
published
3.10
Barbara Westergren
published 3.5
3.10
Sherri Terao
published
3.04
Kristin Giammona
published
2.93
Gabi Hederer
published 3.5
Julie Henriques
published
Sherry Keogh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jo Lee + Dana Knapp134 matchesnot enough data
Meike Sillevis Smitt + Gabi Hederer123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jo Lee + Jane Ensor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shashi Navar
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Lara Norman-Stowers
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
Meike Sillevis Smitt
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Janet Arsenault
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Jane Ensor
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dana Knapp
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amanda Holmquist
1W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Mary Jo Lee
7W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Jan Immer
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Barbara Westergren
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Sherri Terao
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kristin Giammona
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Gabi Hederer
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.93
Julie Henriques
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherry Keogh
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.