Teams

River Strand Rallycats III

2026 Sarasota Trilevel Summer Weekend · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.86 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-29vs TPC Tri Sat 4.0/3.5/3.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesStephanie Miller / Kristen Weston vs Lori Madden / Brittany Blackman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Anderson / Sandra Shallcross vs Jennifer Olliges / Lorraine Forzani2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-22vs LWR Cherry RanchersWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Keyser / Kara Beene vs Nia Esposito / Svetlana Janglin6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Weston / Stephanie Miller vs Anne Marinaccio / Krista Sprungman7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-15vs Payne Park Narwhals TrilevelWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Curle / Nancy Finman vs Jacqueline Ritchey / Barbara Prince6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusanne Booth / Kristen Weston vs Christine Shields / Rebecca Zion6-0, 6-4
2026-08-12vs Laurel Oak Weekend RacketeersLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Curle / Kim Reiser vs Cindy Rosenberg / Courtney Rosenthal6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCori Knupp / Kristen Weston vs Alicia Cohler / Lynne Powell7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Baig / Tanile Wright vs Heather Chadwick / Carissa DRESSEL2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-25vs TPC Tri Sat 4.0/3.5/3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Emily Franklin vs Yudi Carpenter / Fabiola Beckmann6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCori Knupp / Susanne Booth vs Lori Madden / Brittany Blackman5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Anderson / Karen Baig vs Teri Arrington / Susan Mihm6-2, 6-4
2026-07-18vs LWR Cherry RanchersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen Keyser / Kim Reiser vs Karen Spiegel / Nia Esposito5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Weston / Stephanie Miller vs Anne Marinaccio / Krista Sprungman6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKelly Anderson / Tanile Wright vs Joani Crean / Gina Ferlise4-6, 6-7
2026-07-11vs Payne Park Narwhals TrilevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Curle / Nancy Finman vs Jacqueline Ritchey / Danielle Sherrill6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusanne Booth / Kristen Weston vs Christine Shields / Patty Avery1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTanile Wright / Kelly Anderson vs Prentiss McNeill / Felicia Pirritino6-1, 6-3
2026-06-27vs Laurel Oak Weekend RacketeersWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Annmarie Curle vs Carla Rodman / Cindy Rosenberg6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCori Knupp / Susanne Booth vs Alicia Cohler / Sandra Poston6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSandra Shallcross / Tanile Wright vs Shannon Pastras / Erin Herrick4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Annmarie Curle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Kim Reiser
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.90
Kara Beene
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Nancy Finman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Kristen Keyser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Emily Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Cori Knupp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Kristen Weston
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.51
Susanne Booth
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.37
Stephanie Miller
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Sandra Shallcross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Tanile Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Karen Baig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Kelly Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Reiser + Emily Franklin5164% games+13.7% vs expected
Stephanie Miller + Kristen Weston4160% games+13.2% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Nancy Finman7457% games+13.0% vs expected
Nancy Finman + Annmarie Curle6166% games+11.8% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Kara Beene4552% games+4.4% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Kristen Weston2348% games+2.4% vs expected
Kara Beene + Nancy Finman705552% games−2.4% vs expected
Annmarie Curle + Emily Franklin4355% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annmarie Curle
99W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Kim Reiser
105W–66L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Kara Beene
240W–153L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Nancy Finman
138W–95L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Kristen Keyser
69W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.80
Emily Franklin
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
Cori Knupp
26W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.58
Kristen Weston
34W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Susanne Booth
79W–91L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Stephanie Miller
79W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Sandra Shallcross
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.29
Tanile Wright
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Karen Baig
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Kelly Anderson
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.