Teams

Bako - Volley Vanquishers

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.5 - Bake

17 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-29vs Bako - Point BreakLost 01
L#3 DoublesLuann Shults / Brenda Kettler vs Megan Reed / Krista Rodriguez2-6, 2-6
2025-06-15vs LLW - Bako - Miami VibeLost 03
L#1 SinglesColleen Paulden vs Erin Black3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLara Docherty vs Susan Frakes1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Gamboa / Cindy Goodmon vs Jessie Blackwell / Agnes DeJong1-6, 2-6
2025-05-18vs Bako - Point BreakLost 01
L#1 SinglesLuann Shults vs Sheridan Hadaway0-6, 1-6
2025-03-30vs LLW - Bako - Miami VibeLost 01
L#3 DoublesLuann Shults / Brenda Kettler vs Sofie Hay / Jessie Blackwell2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Kori Harrison
published
3.19
Diane Bashirtash
published 3.5
3.11
Sandra Gamboa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Colleen Paulden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Leah Coughlin
published
3.06
Rebecca Badgett
published
3.03
Nahla Tamer
published
3.02
Lori McQuilliams
published
2.97
Jeannie Munn
published
2.88
Luann Shults
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.87
Cindy Goodmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Lara Docherty
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.74
Brenda Kettler
published 3
Gioconda Erquiaga
published
Odeyca Garriquez
published
Rosemarie Galindo
published
Samantha Pankey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Goodmon + Brenda Kettler4350% games−1.1% vs expected
Rebecca Badgett + Sandra Gamboa3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kori Harrison
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Diane Bashirtash
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Sandra Gamboa
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Colleen Paulden
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Leah Coughlin
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Rebecca Badgett
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Nahla Tamer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Lori McQuilliams
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jeannie Munn
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Luann Shults
37W–35L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Cindy Goodmon
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Lara Docherty
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
3
Brenda Kettler
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Gioconda Erquiaga
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Odeyca Garriquez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosemarie Galindo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Pankey
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.