Teams

SD WE LLW 3.5 La Jolla TC/ Chang

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-29vs SD 3.5WE Peninsula/ GamaraWon 10
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Bartolome / Janet Costa vs Lisa Serrano / Cherie Hibbs6-0, 6-2
2022-05-22vs SD 3.5WE Mountain View/ IrvingWon 20
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Bartolome / Janet Costa vs Sarah Eade / Linda Olson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTina Mertel / Angela Chang vs Kris Temple / Evelyn Irving6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAu-Co MAI / Chantal McCullough vs Madeleine West / Brandy Baray1-6, 0-6
2022-05-08vs SD 3.5WE LJB&TC/ MichaelsenLost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Mertel / Amanda MacLeod vs Janey Michaelsen / Leslie Evans0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-01vs SD 3.5WE SDTRC/ MonzonLost 01
L#1 DoublesGabrielle Bartolome / Chantal McCullough vs Whitney Ginter / Helen Beran6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTina Mertel / Janet Costa vs Dana Davalos / Danaelle Rodriguez6-3, 6-1
2022-04-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesAngela Chang / Tina Mertel vs Jasmin Zepeda / Veronica Sheahan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-03vs SD 3.5WE SDTRC/ GarveyWon 10
W#1 SinglesGabrielle Bartolome vs Gretchen Shaffer6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Angela Chang
published 4.5
4.13
Gabrielle Bartolome
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.48
Sarah Bruno
published
3.30
Tina Mertel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Janet Costa
published
3.14
Au-Co MAI
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Melanie Gilmore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Mertel + Sarah Bruno404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Chang
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Gabrielle Bartolome
25W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
Sarah Bruno
21W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Tina Mertel
36W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Janet Costa
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Au-Co MAI
67W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Melanie Gilmore
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.