Teams

OC Seal Beach TC - Mark - Sun1130

2026 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Men 7.0 Super Seniors

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 13 3:00 PM
Newport Beach Tennis Club
Sep 20 11:30 AM
Seal Beach Tennis Center
Sep 27 11:30 AM
Seal Beach Tennis Center
Oct 4 11:30 AM
Seal Beach Tennis Center
Oct 10 3:00 PM
Costa Mesa Tennis Center
Oct 18 1:00 PM
Racquet Club of Irvine
2026-08-30vs OC RCI - Mark/Alex Sun1Won 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Mansonhing / Forrest Morrow vs Pablo Moreno / Frank Carroll1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAl Jasinskas / Jonathan Lane vs Larry Weinstein / Mel Schantz5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffery Kam / Hiro Saito vs David Kubicek / Mark Moore7-5, 6-2
2026-08-22vs OC CMTC - Frank - Sat3Won 21
L#1 DoublesDean Kitano / Jeffery Kam vs Frank Carlos / Bill Hahn5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMark Gross / Danny Castle vs Richard Reiter / Mark Tavill2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesForrest Morrow / Joseph Ntung vs William Matheny / Dave Ferree6-1, 6-0
2026-08-15vs OC NBTC - Eddie S/S3Won 30
W#1 DoublesRonald Bone / Danny Castle vs Steve Weaver / Robert Negrete6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDean Kitano / Jeffery Kam vs Ronald Dujenski / Jonathon Prendergast6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesForrest Morrow / Paul Mansonhing vs Peter Sun / Guy Grimes6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · OC Men 7.0 Super Seniors
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Seal Beach TC - Mark - Sun11301030016
2OC RCI - Mark/Alex Sun11030118
3OC CMTC - Frank - Sat30103632
4OC NBTC - Eddie S/S30103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Al Jasinskas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Jeffery Kam
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.60
Ronald Bone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Mark Gross
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dean Kitano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Danny Castle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Jonathan Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Mark Blons
published
Forrest Morrow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Greg Tong
published
Hiro Saito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Ntung
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Perdue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Mansonhing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Timothy Ching
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronald Bone + Danny Castle10163% gamesnot enough data
Jeffery Kam + Ronald Bone404 matchesnot enough data
Mark Gross + Jeffery Kam033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Gross + Hiro Saito213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Al Jasinskas
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Jeffery Kam
148W–117L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.64
3.5
Ronald Bone
115W–29L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
Mark Gross
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Dean Kitano
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Danny Castle
119W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Jonathan Lane
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Mark Blons
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
Forrest Morrow
26W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Greg Tong
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Hiro Saito
23W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joseph Ntung
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michael Perdue
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Paul Mansonhing
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Ching
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.