Teams

CTH Net Ninjas PR

Mixed 18 & Over 2024 · Mixed 18 & Over 6.0- Flight III

6 players · average NTRP / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-03vs Alturas de Torrimar AngelLost 02
L#2 DoublesIsaias Martinez / Veronica Matos de Jesus vs Jorge MacIas / Maria Gabriela Herrera1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEdwin A Berrios Gandarilla / Ivette Linares vs Jose Viggiano / Cristina Bras4-6, 1-6
2024-03-02vs Caguas AstridLost 01
L#2 DoublesVeronica Matos de Jesus / Edwin A Berrios Gandarilla vs Freddie Morales / Javilmary Torres4-6, 5-7
2024-02-23vs Tortuguero FernandoWon 21
W#1 DoublesDorma Lugo / Edwin A Berrios Gandarilla vs Allanys Mendez / Fernando Silvagnoli6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKirsis Garcia / Isaias Martinez vs Gisela Davila / Ricardo Torres Lopez0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVeronica Matos de Jesus / Luis Fuentes vs Juan Vera / Marilei Rivera Vera6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-17vs Caguas AstridLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenny Gonzalez / Dorma Lugo vs Neftali Feliciano / Javilmary Torres2-6, 1-6
2024-02-10vs CTH JhensenLost 02
L#1 DoublesLuis Fuentes / Dorma Lugo vs Nicole Colon / Hector Reyes0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesIsaias Martinez / Veronica Matos de Jesus vs Jhensen Melendez / YARI BAEZ6-7, 3-6
2024-02-02vs CTH JhensenLost 02
L#1 DoublesDorma Lugo / Jeffrey G. Rolon Carrero vs Nicole Colon / Hector Reyes1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVeronica Matos de Jesus / Edwin A Berrios Gandarilla vs Brayan Caliz / Neshma Nicole Colon Collazo0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Mixed 18 & Over 6.0- Flight III
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTH Jhensen7118612149
2Caguas Astrid7117715152
3Alturas de Torrimar Angel25101125197
4CTH Net Ninjas PR1531531204
5Tortuguero Fernando1661532218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Edwin A Berrios Gandarilla
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Luis Fuentes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Dorma Lugo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Isaias Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Ivette Linares
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Veronica Matos de Jesus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edwin A Berrios Gandarilla
16W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Luis Fuentes
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Dorma Lugo
11W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%72%28%
2.42
Isaias Martinez
1W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.34
Ivette Linares
14W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
Veronica Matos de Jesus
7W–14L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.