Teams

University Park Giaimo

2024 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 7.0 W Wednesday

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-13vs LWR SteffensLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Vieira / Claudia Clark vs Beth Hill / Noelle Hage2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJodi Joerres / Cindy Pratt vs Anne White / Cynthia Strathmann4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-21vs LBK Public LevyLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaula Lapierre / Jodi Joerres vs Diana Trivax Levy / Karen Davis5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Ellen Giaimo / Lisa Vieira vs Ute Vela-Marquez / Dana Marpoe4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-02-14vs LWR VavrekLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Vieira / Claudia Clark vs Cindy Vavrek / Carol Frazier3-6, 2-6
2024-02-07vs LWN ArringtonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Dietz / Jodi Joerres vs Sherry Chase / Melissa Kinney2-6, 4-6
2024-01-31vs Payne Park Sets in the CityWon 20
W#1 DoublesCecile Wooster / Lisa Vieira vs Linda Evans / Brenda Shields6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaula Lapierre / Jodi Joerres vs Sarah Loomis / JoMarie Privitera6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-24vs LBK Club HowardSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDebra Dietz / Lisa Vieira vs Linda Mitchell / Nancy Smith6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJodi Joerres / Dodie Shuert vs Ann Miklas / Cyn Gillespie2-6, 6-7
2024-01-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJodi Joerres / Lisa Vieira vs Patty Buggy / Camille Rutan6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Linda Heitzner
published
3.43
Betsy Nelson
published 3.5
3.43
Cecile Wooster
published 3.5
3.25
Jodi Joerres
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Dodie Shuert
published
Jennifer Gould
published
Lisa Vieira
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Terry Williamson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Joerres + Lisa Vieira4160% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Joerres + Linda Heitzner123 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Joerres + Cecile Wooster213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Heitzner + Cecile Wooster213 matchesnot enough data
Terry Williamson + Betsy Nelson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Heitzner
26W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Betsy Nelson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Cecile Wooster
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Jodi Joerres
55W–43L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Dodie Shuert
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Gould
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Vieira
23W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Williamson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.