Teams

DARA WOODRUFF

2026 SETX Combo · WOMEN 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-26vs APRIL HECKERWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Moore / Jill Williams vs Kaylee Hall / April Fox7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShirley Boone / Madeline Singleton vs Donna Garcia / Skylar Murphy6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDara Woodruff / Theresa Edwards vs Carole Jones / Maissa Salibi6-0, 6-1
2026-08-25vs PAM WHITTINGTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadeline Singleton / Shirley Boone vs Stephany Bryant / Katherine Aras7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTheresa Edwards / Charlean Lindsey vs Wendy Nobles / Myia Barton7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJill Williams / Dara Woodruff vs Crystal Curl / Julia Grass6-3, 6-2
2026-08-18vs CATHY TAYLORLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Foster / Theresa Edwards vs Cheyenne Williams / Madeline Kelly2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStephanie Dodson-McGowen / Karen Fertitta vs Angie LaBiche / Catherine Taylor6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesShirley Boone / Cheryl Rizzo vs Victoria Smith / Ashley Richard1-6, 4-6
2025-10-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesKasey Foster / Lori Moore vs Victoria Smith / Kyley Israel6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTruc-Linh Aulbaugh / Lori Moore vs Summer Hackbarth / Sarah Keating3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Cheryl Rizzo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Stephanie Dodson-McGowen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Charlean Lindsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Lori Moore
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Dara Woodruff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Shirley Boone
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Fertitta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Madeline Singleton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Theresa Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Rizzo
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Stephanie Dodson-McGowen
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Charlean Lindsey
22W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Lori Moore
36W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.85
3
Dara Woodruff
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Shirley Boone
12W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Karen Fertitta
23W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Madeline Singleton
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Theresa Edwards
22W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.