Teams

Ponte Vedra - Saig

2023 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-07vs SPRING - BillionLost 12
L#1 DoublesElaine Ward / Jacqueline Bell Egan vs Cynthia McGehee / Elena Sise4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Griswell / Heather LaPrade vs Grace Costello / Meredith Frisch7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Brulte / Sarah-Lynn le Roux vs Violet Deen / Eileen Edsall6-7, 1-6
2023-05-31vs SPRING - BillionSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKymberly Kochis / Jacqueline Bell Egan vs Violet Deen / Anne Billion3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJill Saig / Sarah-Lynn le Roux vs Grace Costello / Heidi Gennerman6-1, 6-0
2023-05-17vs SPRING - BillionLost 02
L#2 DoublesElaine Ward / Sarah-Lynn le Roux vs Grace Costello / Meredith Frisch0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJill Saig / Heather LaPrade vs Violet Deen / Ellen Dyal6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-10vs SPRING - BillionSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFranzi Herman / Heather LaPrade vs Violet Deen / Elena Sise6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Saig / Jacqueline Bell Egan vs Cynthia McGehee / Eileen Edsall6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-26vs SPRING - BillionWon 10
W#2 DoublesElaine Ward / Sarah-Lynn le Roux vs Faye Woods / Lee Kester6-1, 6-2
2023-04-19vs SPRING - BillionWon 30
W#1 DoublesFranzi Herman / Sarah-Lynn le Roux vs Meredith Frisch / Cynthia McGehee6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHeather LaPrade / Andrea Griswell vs Faye Woods / Julie Schweers6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Kymberly Kochis vs Cecilia Collins / Ellen Dyal7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Sarah-Lynn le Roux
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.29
Kymberly Kochis
published
4.10
Jill Saig
published
4.01
Suzanne Brulte
published
3.90
Elaine Ward
published
3.81
Jacqueline Bell Egan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Addison Crenshaw
published 4
3.77
Heather LaPrade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Kathy Parker
published
Franzi Herman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Bell Egan + Heather LaPrade9852% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sarah-Lynn le Roux
44W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.54
Kymberly Kochis
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
Jill Saig
35W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
4.10
Suzanne Brulte
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
4.01
Elaine Ward
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Jacqueline Bell Egan
145W–100L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Addison Crenshaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Heather LaPrade
101W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Kathy Parker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Franzi Herman
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.