Teams

Flesch/Memphis

2023 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 5.5 18 & Over Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 5.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Jessica Flesch
published
2.96
Nancy Rose
published
2.74
Marjorie Noldon
published
2.63
Camille Stump
published 3
2.61
Lauryn Yackel
published
2.58
Rebecca Hannaman
published
2.40
Kate Linebarger
published
2.37
Candi McMorran
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Flesch
28W–21L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Nancy Rose
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
Marjorie Noldon
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Camille Stump
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.63
Lauryn Yackel
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
Rebecca Hannaman
11W–23L career · no lines in 2023
0%29%71%
2.58
Kate Linebarger
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.40
3
Candi McMorran
13W–36L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.